Recent content by pete94857

I saw a Tesla just the other day smashed up beside the road. No other cars involved. No one seriously injured.

We (the AI and I) did produce the program wether it would function as intended I don't know I was more interested in how the AI would respond to making something like that, some of its "thoughts" were quite surprising. For the emotional side we basically placed code to run as our own chemistry...

Well when I started this thread I never expected it to turn into the discussion it has. A lot of fear from AI and paranoid theories. Most of which are probably valid, particularly in the short term the line from very advanced AI and still a disfunction global society until AI becomes more of a...

I've just re-read the rules and guidelines there's nothing presently in it expressing any rule against it. They do seem to have changed since the last time I checked them so that's good. It just makes things more efficient as I can run something by the AI it can then input or alter any mistakes...

I believe previously there was a rule regarding posting threads that had AI influence. I am dyslexic and using AI helps me a lot. I believe to have a rule explicitly denying threads with AI influence is unrealistic in today's environment. Most experimental physics has AI influence involved. So...

OK thanks really appreciate it

So kind of both are correct. An almost instant but small reaction felt at the far end of the bar but a larger change that moves (kind of) along the bar at a much slower pace the higher the permeability the slower it will be ? Have I understood it correctly. Would the example on the efficiency...

Thank you.

I have conflicting information hence here I am. 2 different source that I believe to be credible have given me 2 different answers. And both actually make sense. Does a higher permeability mean that the reaction through the material will actually travel (not travel but just in a descriptive...

I see, I considered as you were disagreeing with the interpretation you were in a way disagreeing with the actual purpose of her attemps at proving the inverse square law as a way to calculate the force between 2 opposing magnets therefore in essence not trusting the data. Your interpretation of...

You maybe correct but there are still bearing resistance x2 and the fact the the magnets are not aligned as one is fixed to the bottom of a pendulum the other is held straight. Saturation is definitely a problem, plus i doubt the accuracy is correct. Although over all it would give a very loose...

After further analysis of the video I completely agree that the video is flawed. And although your analysis of the data produced is correct the data produced is also completely flawed based on the equipment used to perform the experiment. If a straight bar is suspended by a bearing at its top...

I've just seen a video made by Dr. Usha Singh associate physics professor. It showed a practical experiment giving results that the changing field is directly proportional to the inverse square law. It involves two bar magnets. I do however have some conflicting information. When analysing...

Notes taken thank you

I do thank you, I should have put KE = 1/2 ×I x Wf