Peter Morgan's latest activity
-
Peter Morgan reacted to gentzen's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with
Like.
The "we ignore" part is certainly true. The reasoning why it gets ignored is probably not so much that it is the same as QM, but that... -
Peter Morgan reacted to pines-demon's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with Like.
Don't worry Ballentine made it to the list.
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.I take the minimal statistical interpretation of QM to be qualitatively different from QFT insofar as there is no idea of a collection...
-
Peter Morgan reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with Like.
By the paper cited, we now know much better than we used to know....
-
Peter Morgan reacted to Herman Trivilino's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
I can't speak for @Nugatory but my understanding of what he said is not that we shouldn't look, but that until we succeed in finding...
-
Peter Morgan reacted to Nugatory's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
By proposing a further explanation. Until this happens there is no explanation, just as a book does not exist until someone writes it.
-
Peter Morgan reacted to WernerQH's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
A while ago @bhobba pointed to an interesting paper by T Padmanabhan: "Obtaining the Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics from Quantum...
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.tl;dr summary: We will not here consider quantum field theory whatsoever. I suppose that's part of what orthodoxy requires: we can...
-
Peter Morgan reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
Ah, I see; you're really thinking in terms of QFT, not non-relativistic QM. In QFT the whole idea of the "state" of a system is...
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?.As a tensor product of states. If we consider the Wightman axioms, they do not mention tensor products at all. There is a very weakened...
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?.In QFT, as in SR, I take kinematics and dynamics to be merged into a single 3+1-dimensional model of the world (my feeling is that...
-
Peter Morgan reacted to RUTA's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
Allori has a nice overview of different types of explanation used in quantum foundations here: https://www.mdpi.com/2624-960X/5/1/7...
-
Peter Morgan replied to the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?.CM+ includes contextuality/measurement incompatibility, which allows multiple experiments to be modeled in a single algebraic structure...
-
Peter Morgan reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
I don't think quantum mechanics needs to be changed - only its interpretation must be made more rational. This is what I think I...
-
Peter Morgan reacted to gentzen's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
Asher Peres (1978) Unperformed experiments have no results. Rudolf Peierls (1991) In defense of „measurement“.
