Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Log in
Register
What's new
Latest activity
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Style variation
System
Light
Dark
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
PeterDonis's latest activity
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
.
Not quite. It's true that "deterministic, but with epistemic uncertainty" forces you to accept something like the Bohmian...
Tuesday, 6:22 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
.
But there are QM interpretations where the results are epistemic and the assumptions you refer to are violated. For example, the Bohmian...
Tuesday, 6:19 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
You still haven't shown the math of how you pick these out from other stresses. And, as I pointed out in a post some time ago, and...
Tuesday, 4:47 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
No, this is not correct. If you apply external forces to each part of the object sufficient to account for the proper acceleration of...
Tuesday, 4:42 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
I think their claim is more limited than that. De Sitter spacetime has a timelike KVF, and a Killing motion using that KVF can certainly...
Tuesday, 4:13 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
Ah, ok. I don't think that's what @Ibix was describing: he was describing setting up a static network of rockets in Schwarzschild...
Tuesday, 4:08 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
Which congruence are you referring to? The one that describes moving the structure from flat spacetime to curved spacetime?
Tuesday, 3:58 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
Ah, got it, thanks! The key point is that the form given by Moller (1952) explicitly shows that the orthogonal spatial slices are flat...
Tuesday, 3:35 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
Wouldn't this violate the H-N theorem if it were true?
Tuesday, 3:05 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
If the proper acceleration of each worldline is not constant, the congruence is not stationary.
Tuesday, 3:03 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
Hm. This congruence would be irrotational, but I don't think its orthogonal hypersurfaces would be flat. So it would not meet the...
Tuesday, 2:54 PM
PeterDonis
reacted to
PAllen's post
in the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
with
Like
.
Ok, that is fine. However, what is true includes that, in an invariant sense, you can't place the rockets in the new locations at the...
Tuesday, 2:50 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
I think the intent was to have the same physical threads in the second case--that you would take the structure built in flat spacetime...
Tuesday, 12:25 PM
PeterDonis
reacted to
Ibix's post
in the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
with
Like
.
Perhaps a slightly different experiment might help. Consider a flock of small rockets. Initially they are at rest far from a black hole...
Tuesday, 12:03 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
But what does that relaxed proper length depend on? You seem to be saying that, if I build two beams of the exact same material, one in...
Tuesday, 12:02 PM
Forums
Back
Top