PeterDonis's latest activity
-
PeterDonis reacted to Cthugha's post in the thread I Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment with
Like.
Michelson interferometers, Mach-Zehnder interferometers (and also the double slit) measure field correlations. The quantity you measure... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment.Correct. Both of them are interferometers, yes. What gets observed at any detector depends on the relative amplitude and phase of the... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment.Both of them have one source, which gets split by a beam splitter into two beams. Just as I described in post #4. -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Euclidean geometry and gravity.No, but it was part of the specific scenario we were discussing as I understood it. Yes, that's correct. See my discussion with... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Euclidean geometry and gravity.In the general sense of "stress", which in relativity means "the components of the stress-energy tensor", yes, I agree. I should have... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment.Yes. You have one light beam coming from a source, which is split by a beam splitter, and then you have two detectors, and you look for... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment.It would help if you would give specific references for where you read or were told these things. -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment.A single Stern-Gerlach experiment is not a "correlation experiment". To do a correlation experiment with Stern-Gerlach devices, you need... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Euclidean geometry and gravity.The structure would have to be narrow enough for the variation in ##r## for a transverse beam to be negligible. Otherwise its proper... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Euclidean geometry and gravity.No, that's not the claim that was made. Here's the claim that was made: The beam is supposed to be held static against gravity in... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Euclidean geometry and gravity.I hadn't looked at it in detail because I was focusing on the first part and wanting to understand it. Having now looked at it, I'm not... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Euclidean geometry and gravity.You don't seem to understand that the proper acceleration is determined by the beam's worldline. You can't adjust it by applying... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Euclidean geometry and gravity.It occurred to me after posting #116 that by "local density" you might have meant something more like "local proper number density of... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Euclidean geometry and gravity.I'm not sure you can do that. If you build the object in flat spacetime in an unstressed state, and then move it to hovering statically... -
PeterDonis replied to the thread I Euclidean geometry and gravity.Depends on what you're trying to show. What I was trying to show is that I can take a rod built in flat spacetime with proper length...