pines-demon's latest activity
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.This is getting very cryptic. I take ##S_\theta=S_x\cos\theta+S_p\sin\theta=\alpha S_x+\beta S_p##, I do what then? ##S_\theta^2## or...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Isn’t ##\alpha\beta=\cos\theta\sin\theta## different than 0 for most angles?
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Is this related to the state? to the observables or to what? I am lost here. There are clearly interference terms in whatever you are...
-
Ppines-demon reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with
Like.
How does it even make sense to combine position and momentum eigenkets? I don't understand what you're doing here. -
Ppines-demon reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with Like.
Fair enough, replace my minus sign with a plus sign and make them bosons. :oops:
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.I think you misunderstood, see the edit to post #37, are you telling me that you can write $$|\psi\rangle=\int \mathrm d x |x\rangle...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Can you be more explicit? What do you mean that it does not contain interferences?
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.We were writing in short form, the initial state has an integral ##\int \mathrm d x\, |x\rangle |\pm x\rangle##. (I will edit it) Also...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Ok lets try. Prepare your state in whatever version you prefer ##\int \mathrm d x\, |x\rangle|\pm x\rangle##. Now you have two options...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Fine take ##|p\rangle|-p\rangle## what is the problem of being in the same position? We can figure out the spin or use a boson.
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Experiment.
-
Ppines-demon reacted to martinbn's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with Like.
I don't have a prove that something is impossible. My statement is based only on the fact that I have not seen it done. @pines-demon...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.What is the issue with that? just take a finite time after that? Why are you focusing on that point? You could instead start with some...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Thanks for stepping in. I hoped that there was something stronger that I was missing. Trying to perform Bell tests on the original EPR...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Does it matter? just prepare the state. Agreed