pines-demon's latest activity

The latter is (as the name says) an approximation of the former, where only the first order term in the Born series is taken into account.

Read on correspondence principle here: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bohr-correspondence/ As with all Bohr principles, the guy...

It must be my translator; I misspelled it once and now it always translate it that way by default. I don't know how to fix it...

Do you have a reason to put an accent in Barandes -> Barandés? It is not the first time I seen it here.

In this case, it's not from Zeilinger, but I would like to see the following translated into Barandés' terms...

I mean something more human level. Imagine that one tries to reproduce an entanglement experiment à la Mermin, you drop some assumption...

which paper?

Can you provide a simple example of what would that look like?

Sure but I am talking about the dynamics (the indivisible part).

I can’t because I do not have any clear example of this kind of non-Markovian dynamics in other contexts.

A mathematical correspondence is not an interpretation. Is a Wick rotation an interpretation? for me Barandes vision is missing a toy...

This is a key point! In one of his many talks, Barandes said that, in his formulation, the typical spatial non-locality that arises from...

Yes. The question is whether the Bell sense actually captures the notion of nonlocal influence if dynamics are non-Markovian. From "La...

This is the part were I remain skeptic, the dynamics remains nonlocal in the Bell sense but local in Barandes sense. We are repeating...

Where does he claim that?