pines-demon's latest activity
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Who is being cryptic? 1) Please be explicit on what is the calculation to perform to check if there is interference. 2) Why is it needed?
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.This is getting very cryptic. I take ##S_\theta=S_x\cos\theta+S_p\sin\theta=\alpha S_x+\beta S_p##, I do what then? ##S_\theta^2## or...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Isn’t ##\alpha\beta=\cos\theta\sin\theta## different than 0 for most angles?
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Is this related to the state? to the observables or to what? I am lost here. There are clearly interference terms in whatever you are...
-
Ppines-demon reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with
Like.
How does it even make sense to combine position and momentum eigenkets? I don't understand what you're doing here. -
Ppines-demon reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with
Like.
Fair enough, replace my minus sign with a plus sign and make them bosons. :oops: -
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.I think you misunderstood, see the edit to post #37, are you telling me that you can write $$|\psi\rangle=\int \mathrm d x |x\rangle...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Can you be more explicit? What do you mean that it does not contain interferences?
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.We were writing in short form, the initial state has an integral ##\int \mathrm d x\, |x\rangle |\pm x\rangle##. (I will edit it) Also...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Ok lets try. Prepare your state in whatever version you prefer ##\int \mathrm d x\, |x\rangle|\pm x\rangle##. Now you have two options...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Fine take ##|p\rangle|-p\rangle## what is the problem of being in the same position? We can figure out the spin or use a boson.
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Experiment.
-
Ppines-demon reacted to martinbn's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with
Like.
I don't have a prove that something is impossible. My statement is based only on the fact that I have not seen it done. @pines-demon... -
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.What is the issue with that? just take a finite time after that? Why are you focusing on that point? You could instead start with some...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Thanks for stepping in. I hoped that there was something stronger that I was missing. Trying to perform Bell tests on the original EPR...