Recent content by pkrahn

I can accept sci-fi that explores ideas that are not theoretically disproven. And I do realize that any actual attempt to foretell the future beyond the next few decades takes some luck. But if something looks like it's not allowed by a pretty good understanding of physics then I have little...

Actually this is still clear as mud. I now understand a bit better what scientists are finding, but... if this entanglement isn't actually FTL communication via their own channels, then it is, as I understand, that every possibility is happening at once? And we're tapping into this somehow...

Thanks for all the info. Bell's Theorem will hopefully make more and more sense as I wrap my head around some of the basics. These Eisenberg experiments are fascinating.

Ah, that might clear up some of my confusion. "Local hidden variables" never made total sense, I think because of the usage of "entanglement". The way I'm familiar with the word it would imply that there's a continued connection that affects each particle, as opposed to a synchronicity that's...

1. I mean... both particles are set on the same course, the same "random" sequence from there on out. Until one particle is interferred with after which time it wouldn't sync up with the other particle when measured. Which would mean they aren't actually entangled. I believe they are actually...

I posed these questions via email to a few actual physicists, with the only responses received coming from those that admit to not fully understanding the subject matter. And maybe it's too simplistic for the others. I've read countless articles but haven't come across satisfactory answers, at...