renormalize's latest activity
-
Rok it's back and now ## and $$ work in preview mode, also preview works with conversations
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Paradox in Induced Dipole Forces: Does it violate Newton's Third Law?.In Physics Forums you should use ## to wrap in-line LaTeX equations and $$ to wrap display equations. I've reformatted your post below...
-
Rrenormalize reacted to anuttarasammyak's post in the thread Undergrad Mixed approximation vs. full approximation for a power series expansion with
Like.
By the equations of post #4 $$x(0)=1-\frac{h(0)}{f(0)}=0$$ so $$(c_3+c_5)f(0)=c_1c_2$$ Is that correct ? We do not have freedom of... -
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Why is a Gaussian function used to represent a wave packet?.Yes, the spreading of single-atom wave packets has been observed experimentally and agrees with theory: In-situ Imaging of a Single-Atom...
-
Rrenormalize reacted to anuttarasammyak's post in the thread Undergrad Mixed approximation vs. full approximation for a power series expansion with
Like.
RHS of (1) would be g which is made of f and t. -
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Mixed approximation vs. full approximation for a power series expansion.I don't see a function "##g##" defined anywhere in those lines.
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Why is gravity a fictitious force?.That's of course a good point. But what empirical evidence exists that demonstrates that we don't really live in ##R^4\,##? It's been...
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Why is gravity a fictitious force?.How do you reconcile this claim with the actual published literature on perturbative quantum gravity? For example, here are two recent...
-
Rrenormalize reacted to anuttarasammyak's post in the thread Undergrad Mixed approximation vs. full approximation for a power series expansion with
Like.
What actually is ##g(f(t),t)## in your case ? -
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Graduate Does a moving particle count as a wave?.A definition is whatever size it needs to be to achieve clarity. Why do you get to define the rules for the "size" of a definition?
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Graduate Does a moving particle count as a wave?.This is a more rigorous (https://www.britannica.com/science/equilibrium-physics): equilibrium, in physics, the condition of a system...
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Graduate Free‑Carrier Index Modulation in Thin Transparent Layers at Visible Wavelengths.I'm by no means expert on this topic, but doped-silicon optical modulators can apparently accomplish this (although not necessarily in...
-
Rrenormalize reacted to PAllen's post in the thread Undergrad Relativistic Uniform Circular Motion with
Like.
For a true point particle, there would be no limit, of this kind at least. Note the post begins: as soon as you give a particle finite size. -
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Graduate “Appropriate Modeling Approach for Thin Plasma Layers”.I think you need to temper your expectations. According to Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics §7.5, lab-scale plasmas have electron...
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Graduate “Appropriate Modeling Approach for Thin Plasma Layers”.Yes, you can model in the "standard" way because it's directly analogous to a multilayer interference filter, but with one of the layers...




