Recent content by ronenfe

That's the most logic thing to assume, that's the reason why i asked why to ever think different. Also about setting an experiment, why do we have to set an experiment to prove the cat is either dead or alive why don't you set an experiment to prove the cat is both dead and alive, i mean i can...

Ok, but still why do we need to claim that before seeing the cat he can be both dead and alive and not dead or alive. Also you don't have to look on the cat, you can hear him breathing and know his state.

Just use a transparent box and watch.

But why we can't say the same thing on quantum particles, that things happens immediately and not when we measure them.

Hi, i didn't understand why we can't explain the situation simply as the cat is either dead or alive immediately after the poison was released or not, and not to assume that only when the observer opened the box the state of the cat was determined, what assumption does it contradict?