Recent content by RUTA

  1. RUTA

    A Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality

    From SEP on Many-Worlds (written by Vaidman):
  2. RUTA

    A Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality

    Here are two serious shortcomings that Albert points out: I've been researching quantum foundations since 1994 and I've seen my colleagues propose many such hypothetical ways to "fix quantum mechanics." I have yet to see any such ideas completed as promised. I doubt Jacob's idea will do any...
  3. RUTA

    A Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality

    It is very relevant, thnx for posting it!
  4. RUTA

    Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality

    You are correct, there is a counterintuitive consequence of the observer-independence of h corresponding to the relativity of simultaneity, i.e., the counterintuitive consequence of the observer-independence of c. The relativity of simultaneity represents a change in our view of Newtonian space...
  5. RUTA

    Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality

    Quantum computing, quantum cryptography, and the reconstruction of quantum mechanics via information-theoretic principles are programs in quantum information theory and the "second quantum revolution." The first two programs get far more attention than the third for obvious reasons. According...
  6. RUTA

    Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality

    Well, I hope one day that introductory physics textbooks will contain our particular completion of the quantum reconstruction of Hilbert space like they do Einstein's reconstruction of the Lorentz transformations. The two are exactly analogous and based on the relativity principle, but as of now...
  7. RUTA

    Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality

    Would you mind moving the link to this Insight to the Quantum Interpretations and Foundations Forum?
  8. RUTA

    I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations

    Here are options for answering questions like this from Allori's paper linked in post #103:
  9. RUTA

    Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality

    Who wrote that summary? It's spot on, yet concise. I've presented this idea more generally at conferences and seminars around the world and published it in a book, papers and blogs, but whoever wrote this summary did a better job :-)
  10. RUTA

    I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations

    And also to you :-) I'm not a philosopher, my philosophy colleague and coauthor Michael Silberstein handles these kinds of questions, but naively my answer is "yes". Many (most?) in foundations believe quantum fields are the fundamental building blocks of reality. I don't see how you can get...
  11. RUTA

    I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations

    Here is a 2023 paper relevant to this thread Many-Worlds: Why Is It Not the Consensus? Abstract: In this paper, I argue that the many-worlds theory, even if it is arguably the mathematically most straightforward realist reading of quantum formalism, even if it is arguably local and...
  12. RUTA

    Insights Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect

    I just retired from 37 years of teaching undergrad physics at Elizabethtown College (not R1, I was paid to teach). I have always wanted to understand reality and felt that physics was the best way for me to do that (it's different for different people, obviously). When I figure something out, I...
  13. RUTA

    Insights Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect

    Let me add something to that plot line before answering your question. The light postulate is not acceptable as an explanans for most people, indeed Lorentz complained "that Einstein simply postulates what we have deduced [the light postulate], with some difficulty and not altogether...
  14. RUTA

    I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?

    Exactly. Entanglement, superposition, complementarity, and randomness all follow necessarily from the relativity principle and the observer-independence of h, just like relativity of simultaneity, length contraction, and time dilation all follow necessarily from the relativity principle and the...
Back
Top