Recent content by Sam Fielder
-
S
Proportionality of frictional force
So would we say that Ff=-vμ ?? To say that the frictional force is proportional and opposite to the velocity multiplied by a constant?- Sam Fielder
- Post #9
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
S
Phase Difference with Initial Conditions for SHM
I do understand how to find the phase value now, thanks for the input!- Sam Fielder
- Post #7
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
S
Phase Difference with Initial Conditions for SHM
--So how would I go about finding the spring constant using the natural frequency with the equation we both suggested?-- EDIT: Did not see your edit. Dismiss comment above. Don't see how this is particularly unsolvable, since it is on a assignment that I am working on, will check back later.- Sam Fielder
- Post #5
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
S
Phase Difference with Initial Conditions for SHM
Wouldn't you have to have the mass of the system that is oscillating in order to find the spring constant of the system; this equation; ω_0 = root(k/m) with ω_0 being the natural frequency.- Sam Fielder
- Post #3
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
S
Phase Difference with Initial Conditions for SHM
Homework Statement A mass-spring system with a natural frequency of 3.6 Hz is started in motion with an initial displacement from equilibrium of 6.1 cm and an initial velocity of 0.7 m/s. What is the value of ϕ? (Question aside: Finding the amplitude of the resulting function?) Homework...- Sam Fielder
- Thread
- Amplitude Conditions Difference Initial Initial conditions Oscillations Phase Phase difference Shm Simple harmonic motion
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
S
Undergrad Acceleration of Submarine when Ejecting Water from its Tanks
This ended up being the final answer: 1.265, thanks siddharth23 and Bystander for all your work with helping me through this, much appreciated! I may have another question very soon, about torque and forces, look out for that one on the new posts! :)- Sam Fielder
- Post #24
- Forum: Mechanics
-
S
Undergrad Acceleration of Submarine when Ejecting Water from its Tanks
With this being the final mass, I have somehow achieved my first answer of 1.265 ms^-2.- Sam Fielder
- Post #23
- Forum: Mechanics
-
S
Undergrad Acceleration of Submarine when Ejecting Water from its Tanks
I will carry out the calculations as this value being the final mass.- Sam Fielder
- Post #22
- Forum: Mechanics
-
S
Undergrad Acceleration of Submarine when Ejecting Water from its Tanks
As the assignment told me that this value was incorrect. Unfortunately.- Sam Fielder
- Post #19
- Forum: Mechanics
-
S
Undergrad Acceleration of Submarine when Ejecting Water from its Tanks
The assignment has told me it is incorrect.- Sam Fielder
- Post #17
- Forum: Mechanics
-
S
Undergrad Acceleration of Submarine when Ejecting Water from its Tanks
Or is it that its a difference in force, which I imagine to be true. Weight of Ship = 589581 N Buoyancy Force = (1000kg/m^3)(9.81ms^-2)(69m^3) = 676890 N Difference in the two: 87309 N --> divide this by the new ships mass 87309N/60100kg = 1.4527 ms^-2 upwards acceleration. I believe this...- Sam Fielder
- Post #15
- Forum: Mechanics
-
S
Undergrad Acceleration of Submarine when Ejecting Water from its Tanks
Simplified: V = m/density = 69000kg/(1000kg/m^3) = 69m^3 Weight of water displaced: 8.9m^3 * 1000kg/m^3 = 8900 kg Weight of ship (post-ejection) = 69000-8900 = 60100 kg (* 9.81ms^-2) = 589581N (Fw) Find acc. --> F(w) = pgV --> F(w)/pV = g --> 589581N/((1000kg/m^3)(69m^3)) = 8.5446 ms^-2 9.81...- Sam Fielder
- Post #14
- Forum: Mechanics
-
S
Undergrad Acceleration of Submarine when Ejecting Water from its Tanks
Well I would use the gravitational acc. with the buoyancy formula to get the Volume displaced by the ship, then I would use the amount of water ejected with its density to find its weight. Subtract that amount from the ships weight, and then work backwards with the same volume, to find the...- Sam Fielder
- Post #11
- Forum: Mechanics
-
S
Undergrad Acceleration of Submarine when Ejecting Water from its Tanks
Well at second glanced, it only seems now that the reason why it is acc. upwards is because of less weight, rather than more buoyancy, because buoyancy only has to do with the amount of water being displaced around the vessel, which is directly related to the volume of the sub which does not change.- Sam Fielder
- Post #9
- Forum: Mechanics
-
S
Undergrad Acceleration of Submarine when Ejecting Water from its Tanks
Well mass would go down, because it is now filled with 8.9m^3 of air instead of water, but the volume would be the same, because the size of the sub has not changed.- Sam Fielder
- Post #7
- Forum: Mechanics