Phase Difference with Initial Conditions for SHM

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mass-spring system undergoing simple harmonic motion (SHM) with given initial conditions, specifically focusing on determining the phase difference (ϕ) and amplitude. The natural frequency is provided, along with initial displacement and velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between initial conditions and the phase difference, questioning how initial velocity affects the phase. There are discussions on the necessity of knowing the mass to determine the spring constant and potential energy equations. Some participants express uncertainty about the solvability of the problem without the mass.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem with various approaches suggested. Some participants have provided guidance on using the natural frequency to find the spring constant and potential energy, while others are questioning the implications of missing information. The discussion reflects differing interpretations of the problem's solvability.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is underdetermined without knowledge of the mass, which is crucial for calculating the spring constant. There is also a mention of the original poster's assignment context, which may impose additional constraints on the discussion.

Sam Fielder
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass-spring system with a natural frequency of 3.6 Hz is started in motion with an initial displacement from equilibrium of 6.1 cm and an initial velocity of 0.7 m/s. What is the value of ϕ?
(Question aside: Finding the amplitude of the resulting function?)

Homework Equations


x=Acos(ωt+ϕ)

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I want to say that if we didn't have a initial velocity, then the phase would be 0 rad, because it would simply start at a maximum, and with the cos function, a maximum at time=0 would be 0 phase, so the introduction of the initial condition is having me at a stand still.

I would also like to find the amplitude of the resulting motion, and was wondering where to start on this, since the initial displacement cannot be taken to be the amplitude because of the initial velocity in the system.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The system is underdetermined (unsolvable) because we don't know the mass.

If we had the mass, we could proceed as follows:

1. Use the frequency and the mass to calculate the spring constant.
2. use the spring constant to write a formula for the potential energy as a function of displacement from the equilibrium point.
3. write an equation expressing the potential energy at maximum displacement equal to potential energy at initial displacement plus initial KE
4. solve to get the amplitude
5. You now have ω and A, so you can use those in your equation above, together with t=0 and x(0)=6.1cm to calculate the phase ϕ.

To see why it's underdetermined, consider that, if the mass is very light, and the initial velocity is outwards, the mass will be very close to its maximum amplitude, as the kinetic energy will be exhausted by even a very small further extension of the spring. If the mass is heavy, it will travel much farther out before the KE runs out. These scenarios correspond to different phases.
 
Last edited:
andrewkirk said:
1. Use the frequency to calculate ##\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}## where ##k## is the spring constant.
2. use the spring constant to write a formula for the potential energy as a function of displacement from the equilibrium point.
3. write an equation expressing the potential energy at maximum displacement equal to potential energy at initial displacement plus initial KE
4. solve to get the amplitude
5. You now have ω and A, so you can use those in your equation above, together with t=0 and x(0)=6.1cm to calculate the phase ϕ.

Wouldn't you have to have the mass of the system that is oscillating in order to find the spring constant of the system; this equation;
ω_0 = root(k/m) with ω_0 being the natural frequency.
 
Sam Fielder said:
Wouldn't you have to have the mass of the system that is oscillating in order to find the spring constant of the system; this equation;
ω_0 = root(k/m) with ω_0 being the natural frequency.
Quite right. I must have been typing a correction on this at the same time as you were pointing it out.
 
andrewkirk said:
Quite right. I must have been typing a correction on this at the same time as you were pointing it out.

--So how would I go about finding the spring constant using the natural frequency with the equation we both suggested?--

EDIT: Did not see your edit. Dismiss comment above.

Don't see how this is particularly unsolvable, since it is on a assignment that I am working on, will check back later.
 
Sam Fielder said:
--So how would I go about finding the spring constant using the natural frequency with the equation we both suggested?--

EDIT: Did not see your edit. Dismiss comment above.

Don't see how this is particularly unsolvable, since it is on a assignment that I am working on, will check back later.
The original problem, finding φ, is solvable. The "question aside" is not.
Solve the 2nd order linear, constant-coefficient ODE with the two initial conditions included. Wind up with x = A cos(ωt + φ). ω is known, A is not determinable.
 
rude man said:
The original problem, finding φ, is solvable. The "question aside" is not.
Solve the 2nd order linear, constant-coefficient ODE with the two initial conditions included. Wind up with x = A cos(ωt + φ). ω is known, A is not determinable.

I do understand how to find the phase value now, thanks for the input!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
12K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K