Sambuco's latest activity
-
Sambuco replied to the thread Graduate How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics?.I would like to participate in the discussion, as I have an objection to Barandes' formulation (we already talked a little about that in... -
Sambuco replied to the thread Seeking clarity on the physical definition of an observer.I believe it's possible to think of QFT as a tool that, given information about the occurrence of a certain past event, allows us to...
-
Sambuco replied to the thread Seeking clarity on the physical definition of an observer.It is worth noting that this statement about wave function collapse is interpretation-dependent. In fact, this is true only for some...
-
Sambuco reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Seeking clarity on the physical definition of an observer with
Haha.
Is that like the difference between all dead and mostly dead? -
Sambuco reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Graduate How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics? with
Like.
Quantum fields aren't waves, they're operators. So I don't think "fields as fundamental" is the same thing as "wave-realist". -
Sambuco reacted to bhobba's post in the thread High School Schrodinger's Ad-Hoc Definition Of The Wave Function with Like.
For those interested in how Schrodinger originally derived his famous equation and why it eventually gave the correct answer (after some...
-
Sambuco reacted to Morbert's post in the thread Graduate How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics? with Like.
This discussion felt a lot more substantive than the discussion with Maudlin, largely because a higher level of familiarity with the...