Sambuco's latest activity
-
Sambuco replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.In that case, Hobson's "interpretation" is not an interpretation, but a different theory with objective collapse, since it doesn't allow... -
Sambuco replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.An interesting aspect related to this is that Barandes mentions in his conversation with David Albert that, in order to formulate the... -
Sambuco replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.If we consider his proposal that, at least for non-relativistic quantum mechanics, the position of particles taking a defined value at... -
Sambuco replied to the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.As an additional comment, in an ideal case, if the system is sufficiently isolated, the limit for very long times doesn't have to be... -
Sambuco reacted to Morbert's post in the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with
Like.
@JesseM Division events are nomolgical. They are features of dynamical laws. Supernatural entities like the Wigner superobserver don't... -
Sambuco reacted to Morbert's post in the thread Undergrad Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with
Like.
Yes in the narrow sense that the dynamics do not supply the conditional probabilities needed to say whether or not such a transition can... -
Sambuco replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.It is worth noting that Valentini's proposal is not the only justification for Born's rule within Bohmian mechanics. There is also the... -
Sambuco replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.What I'm referring to is not whether or not Born's rule is used in Bohmian mechanics, but how Born's rule is demonstrated from the other... -
Sambuco replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.While the proof itself, mathematically speaking, is independent of interpretation, since it only assumes universality, I get the... -
Sambuco replied to the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM.In this paper, Schlosshauer and Fine discuss that particular point: "(...) Zurek’s aim is clearly to derive Born’s rule from within... -
Sambuco reacted to Fra's post in the thread Graduate How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics? with
Informative.
Although this is diverging from the topics, this is critical IMO to any "relational picture", if you require that the relata must be... -
Sambuco reacted to Lord Jestocost's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
“In physics, a theory has three defining constituents: the physical phenomena, the mathematical formalism, and the interpretation. The... -
Sambuco reacted to Lord Jestocost's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
Physics should aim at describing the experiential reality! -
Sambuco reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Like.
As an example, you said that it would be meaningless to say that a classical particles is the same as its position and momentum. But I... -
Sambuco reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread Undergrad Particle vs Wave Interpretations of QM with
Haha.
Sorry, I can't resist. :oldbiggrin: