Recent content by Sasho Andonov

To make antihydrogen (an antiproton bound to a positron) requires supplies of positrons and antiprotons that are moving very slowly (enough to combine into atoms). I am wondering does someone have knowledge how much energy is released if antiproton annihilate itself with positron? What would be...

But, anihilation of the positron with electron from oxygen will produce energy which cuold affect the process of panti-proton anihilation with proton fro oxygen core. Or maybe it will not... (????)

Fir the time being, the only anti-matter atom which was produced by humans is anti-hydrogen atom. I am wonbdering what will happen if this anti-hydrogen collide with normal atom of (for example) oxygen: What will be anihilated and what will survive?

I understand, but the will this temperature (energy) around affect the results of collisions? Under "results of collision", I mean new particles created by collisions.

OK, let's paraphrase my lack of understanding... It is written that early universe was very violent place, with high presure, high temperature, high density and high radiation. In the same time, I have read somewhere that LHC can "simulate the conditions" of early universe. So, if the reactions...

Could someone provide an ainformation what is the temperature inside the Large Hadron Collider (or similar systems) where the colision of particles happens? THANK YOU!!!!

Dear Aidyan, thank you very much for your efforts. I am happy with the answers... Have a nice day!

I agree totally with you, but the article in Quanta Magazine gives another picture of randomness and uncertainty. But I am a little bit sceptical about the statement that the the randomness and uncertainty are different in Quantum Physics then in other areas... If they are different why we are...

My question is more regarding use of randomness vs uncertainty. Are they same in Quantum Mechanics? They are different in other areas...

In Quanta Magazine there is article on this link...

Dear sus, thank you very much! I catch the point and it is clear to me!

Dear Dave, (as gently as possible!) I am fully aware about the way how these two guys tried to answer my question. Have no doubt about that! But I am not sure how you determine that "this forum's philosophy is that of tutelage"? Even it is the philosophy, it is wrong! I asked the question and...

Dear Janus: THANK YOU VERY MUCH! I appreciate very much your excellent, considerable and wise explanation! I wish you excellent night/day!

I have got some answers on my question and I can agree that the problem could be "my inference", but you still did not provide arguments why my inference is wrong. You enter the discussion regarding my question with another question (?)... What does it mean? Sorry, but you are not helping at all...

By your responds I can infer that expansion of univese apply only on clusters, but inside the clusters, in the future, the galaxies will collide due to gravitational attraction... Hmmm... It does not look so scientific... :-( Regarding Vanadium 50's respond, I can say that expansion of the...