Recent content by scifimath

  1. S

    I Why isn't tunnelling considered proof of hidden variables?

    Are those "weak" measurements? Do any of them tell you there is mass present besides satisfying an equation?
  2. S

    I Why isn't tunnelling considered proof of hidden variables?

    I consider pilot-wave theory as accepting hidden variables. What? You can't observe/measure anything while in superposition. I choose to think outside the box. So one theory says it was magic and the other actually has something to say about it.
  3. S

    I Why isn't tunnelling considered proof of hidden variables?

    I'm using the one that allows hidden variables. You aren't going to like this, but I don't think anything while in any type of superposition event has physical mass. Mass is held as a hidden variable value while the particle is in the form of energy (waves).
  4. S

    I Why isn't tunnelling considered proof of hidden variables?

    cool, so you believe in hidden variables?
  5. S

    I Entanglement spin swaps are instantaneous?

    Doesn't the delayed choice experiment show us that we can't know when to start the timer? All I want is for someone to hop on spaceship and fly out a couple light speed seconds to try the entangled speed experiment.
  6. S

    I Why isn't tunnelling considered proof of hidden variables?

    Quantum tunneling does not say mass hops across a barrier, but the experiment can display this result ..so just ignore that fact? You tell me a hidden variable is one in which identified quantities can't be directly observed ..well, we can't observe the quantity of mass a particle has while in...
  7. S

    I Why isn't tunnelling considered proof of hidden variables?

    oh boy, did I hit a nerve with this? If you don't want to consider the contents of my post, then just answer the title question?
  8. S

    I Does observed light travel faster or slower than unobserved?

    So it's not worth testing out ..just-in-case?
  9. S

    I Entanglement spin swaps are instantaneous?

    This is the paper I was talking about when I said "some experiments that try to rule this out". The detectors were within 15.3km, hardly a distance that can prove speed of light isn't involved ..especially when you consider my statement about they don't know when to start the clock if...
  10. S

    I Entanglement spin swaps are instantaneous?

    How can we be so sure? I know it's fast ..but, what if it swaps by the speed of light instead? I know there are some experiments that try to rule this out, however, I don't think they take into consideration that the signal to swap may be initiated by the action that observes one of the...
  11. S

    I Why isn't tunnelling considered proof of hidden variables?

    When I hear that mass of a particle has managed to hop through a solid barrier ..it tells me that the mass was a variable and not physical at the time.
  12. S

    I Does observed light travel faster or slower than unobserved?

    I realize that unobserved light it going to be difficult to measure, but could the double slit experiment be set up to give us an average air time for the particles? I find it hard to believe that a particle acting as a wave would travel at exactly the same speed as an observed one.
Back
Top