Does observed light travel faster or slower than unobserved?

In summary, the conversation discusses the misconception that particles act as waves when unobserved and as particles when observed. This idea was abandoned long ago and is not a part of modern quantum mechanics. There is no way to determine if an experiment is worth doing until all the details are known, such as the setup, measurements, and predicted results. A recommended resource for understanding the true principles of quantum mechanics is the book "Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum" by Leonard Susskind.
  • #1
scifimath
12
0
I realize that unobserved light it going to be difficult to measure, but could the double slit experiment be set up to give us an average air time for the particles? I find it hard to believe that a particle acting as a wave would travel at exactly the same speed as an observed one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You have been reading popularizations based on misconceptions from almost a century ago, before the modern theory of quantum mechanics was developed. The idea that things act as waves when they aren't observed and as particles when they are observed was abandoned long ago and is no part of the modern formalism of quantum mechanics.
 
  • #3
So it's not worth testing out ..just-in-case?
 
  • #4
scifimath said:
So it's not worth testing out ..just-in-case?
There's no way of saying whether the experiment is worth doing until until you have described it in detail: How are you setting things up, what are you going to measure when, what results does quantum mechanics predict for these measurements, how does your experiment differ from experiments that have already been done so that it's asking a new question?
Of course you cannot specify the last two until you know enough of the existing theory to calculate (quantitatively, not qualitatively!) what it says should happen and are familiar with the experiments that have already been done.

You started this thread at the I level, so you may be comfortable with something like Susskind's https://www.amazon.com/dp/0465062903/?tag=pfamazon01-20. That won't help so much with the details of the experiments that have already been done, but it will start you in on what quantum mechanics really says.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. Does the act of observing light affect its speed?

The short answer is no. The speed of light is a fundamental constant in the universe and is not affected by the act of observation. However, the way we measure the speed of light may be affected by our observation methods.

2. What is the difference between observed and unobserved light?

Observed light refers to when we actively measure or detect the light, while unobserved light refers to when the light is not being measured or detected. The speed of light remains the same in both cases.

3. How do we measure the speed of light?

The speed of light is usually measured using advanced instruments such as lasers, mirrors, and detectors. The most common method is the use of a laser to determine the time it takes for light to travel a known distance.

4. Can the speed of light be affected by external factors?

No, the speed of light is not affected by any external factors such as gravity or the medium it travels through. However, the medium it travels through can affect its direction or wavelength.

5. Is the speed of light always constant?

Yes, according to Einstein's theory of relativity, the speed of light is constant and the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. This has been confirmed by numerous experiments and is a fundamental principle in physics.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
472
Replies
3
Views
863
Back
Top