Recent content by shahzk

This is the latest news i can find of cramer's experiments on his website from 2010... toward the end of the ppt he explains that practical issues (e.g. noisy detectors) have not allowed the retro-causality experiments to work yet, but he doesn't believe these are inherent show-stoppers...

thanks... i meant one photon that is split into two... so what would you see at detector A where the signal photon hits in a dark room and you place detector b a light year away? This physicist john cramer doesn't seem to understand this as an inherent limitation to coincidence counting... i...

You lost me there. What does it mean that they are complementary and how does that require coincidence counts? Why is coincidence counts required even with only 1 photon? Thanks.

I thought the coincidence count is there to distinguish multiple photons. What if you just do it in a dark room with only 1 photon... in the DCQE, the photon hits the closer measurement before its entangled partner goes through the prism which will determine its measurability, yet it has an...

Well, the delayed choice quantum eraser causes an unmeasured photon to have its wavefunction collapse because of its entangled partner being collapsed even though the choice of whether to collapse that partner (by the 50/50 random prism) is made after the first one hits the measuring device...

i don't believe that is accurate... the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment (search for it on youtube) shows that even after measurement, once the "information" is erased the interference pattern re-emerges... so the awareness of the information is in fact what collapses wave functions. the...

i don't believe what mumeishi said is true... the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment shows that even after measurement, once the "information" is erased the interference pattern re-emerges... so the awareness of the information is in fact what collapses wave functions. the monkey question...