Recent content by Sky Darmos
-
S
Undergrad Potential energy of spin anti-alignment
I find the use of the word "private theory" very amusing. I guess you mean a theory that was developed by a single individual. So, you are suggesting that Penrose's CCC model, which falls into that category, is somehow more wrong than string theory? String theory is an utter pseudoscience with...- Sky Darmos
- Post #12
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
S
Undergrad Potential energy of spin anti-alignment
Well, in my calculation I assumed that if we double the electron charges which are forced into the same area of space, from 2 to 4, then it is like dividing their confinement space into half, and so the energy needed to bring them together would be double. Consequently, when it is only 3...- Sky Darmos
- Post #10
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
S
Undergrad Potential energy of spin anti-alignment
It is easier to smash two electrons with opposite spins together. It takes more energy to do that with same spin electrons. That is the exclusion principle.- Sky Darmos
- Post #7
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
S
Undergrad Potential energy of spin anti-alignment
Yes, I imply two electrons, and they have to be free. I guess the Zeeman effect is about electrons in orbit only. I would need something similar, but for free electrons.- Sky Darmos
- Post #5
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
S
Undergrad Potential energy of spin anti-alignment
Potential energy of spin anti-alignment does contribute to the total energy of the system. This is evident from the Zeeman effect, the doublet splitting of spectral lines. Ok, yes, I guessed that this calculation is not quantum enough. So, how would I go about calculating this in a proper...- Sky Darmos
- Post #3
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
S
Undergrad Potential energy of spin anti-alignment
Hello everybody, I consider two electrons that have enough kinetic energy to reach their respective classical electron radius. This would be: 2.0514016772310431402e-13 J The corresponding speed is v = 287336682 m/s. The electric field is E = \frac{k_{e}}{R_e^2} = 1.8133774657059088443 ×...- Sky Darmos
- Thread
- Energy Potential Potential energy Spin
- Replies: 14
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
S
Undergrad Is the Divisor (2π)^3 Necessary in Photon Gas Equations?
Oh, I see, they tried to use ℏ everywhere, that is why they had to add the (2π)^3 here. Makes sense, thank you Orodruin.- Sky Darmos
- Post #7
- Forum: Cosmology
-
S
Undergrad Is the Divisor (2π)^3 Necessary in Photon Gas Equations?
Here are the equations as picture files:- Sky Darmos
- Post #3
- Forum: Cosmology
-
S
Undergrad Is the Divisor (2π)^3 Necessary in Photon Gas Equations?
Hello everybody, In this Wikipedia article we find an equation for a photon gas which contradicts an equation given by Stefan Weinberg in his book "The first three minutes": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_gas The equation given here has 16 π k^3 ζ(3) T^3 in the numerator and c^3 h^3...- Sky Darmos
- Thread
- Density Gases Photon
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Cosmology