ok Mr < D > , i write french better , but this forum is in english .
yes you re not sure wether the approach proves or not Rh .so
keep coming to the math page of the website ,that s all i can say .
agree that if zeta(1/2-s) has no zero for s on the crtical strip and if zeta(s-1/2) has no...
There is a commercial aspect of the website ,but in general it s my daily life ,the website .I have decided at the moment to make the website general :all in one website , even in physics page there is some cosmology :easy explanation or model of origin of universe from nothing , from 0 into...
come visit www.guideforex.webs.com[/url] , Riemann hypothesis made easy ,and for any question just type it , there is a math editor .Rieman hypothesis demystified .Yes an easy proof in process there follow the update of the page [PLAIN]www.guideforex.webs.com on math page .
hi mate.don t look far .the Riemann hypothis is easy to prove, it can t be that hard and there might be lot of proofs .i believed it was true ,false too , false , true. but today i believe in one result .true or false ,definitly , i don t think that i will change the last result i have had ,for...
yes it s easy to prove there are no non trivial zero off the crtical strip .cool then .
so .who knows if zeta can be real off the critical line but on the critical strip?then he s got a proof as well it looks .tell me something quickly where do you know zeta real ,for a variable complex on the...
RH is interesting because it s got link with numbers , prime numbers .And number theory is very interesting for information technology .so if you find wether RH is true or false ,you hold something very interesting about the distribution of numbers ,specially prime numbers always used in...
Rh is very likely to be true . I have verified myself that if it s true there is not a problem still ,on the limit calculations theory .if it s false there is a big problem.
But who just said it s been proven there are no nontrivial zero off the critical line?do you have the proof reference?i...
What s going on here ?it s an hypothesis to be confirmed or rejected .rscosa ?no statements please about the location of the zeros.we re doing mathematics here .it s just an hypothesis then we re not allowed to consider it true.i m sorry but you have not seen what it s about yet .
oh yes i see .you can have an intuition that is true too .you might have a suitable answer .the information i got is that there are solutions with imaginary same absolute value .or with imaginary opposite. check \bar{z} when z is a zero .I would like to make sure of your intuition ,but busy...
have you got some proof,or it s not a statement?did you do some calclations?we can work only on proofs ,and close quickly debates because it s mathematics.
i m wondering too why 1/4 and 3/4 ,i m wondering about p/2^n while p<2^n so that we stay in [0 1] with p prime.
i just have noticed the 3/4 , 5/4 when i considered if zeta(z) is close to o then instead of considering zeta(z) i plug in zeta(z) i mean...