Recent content by Stan Stuchinski

  1. S

    Size of observable vs UN-observable Universe, etc

    Yes, I've seen the same figures ("size of an atom to the size of a grapefruit"). The reason I chose 10 centimeters (size of a grapefruit) is because that is the figure I've most often seen in popularized versions of inflation. Yes, of course, the size of the UN-observable Universe must be...
  2. S

    Size of observable vs UN-observable Universe, etc

    I understand that these distances are speculative, but I am given to understand that, at the end of inflation, the diameter of the OBSERVABLE Universe was approximately 10 centimeters. However, the diameter of the UN-OBSERVABLE Universe was a good deal larger, with a diameter of approximately...
  3. S

    How can we calculate universe diameter at a given time

    Thanks, Chronos, for your feedback on my thoughts and questions; it cleared up some of my muddled thinking. Stan
  4. S

    How can we calculate universe diameter at a given time

    Thanks for adding to the conversation, my friends; I found your comments very helpful. I have a few questions, but I think as a preface, I need to define my views regarding a few concepts concerning the diameter of the universe: Subjective View # 1: I don’t accept ANYTHING as being “infinite.”...
  5. S

    How can we calculate universe diameter at a given time

    Thanks for the link, Quarlep; I have been searching various sources for WEEKS for a tabular chart showing this information. Although there ARE a few gaps and I am confused by some of the data, it is a big help and I appreciate your sharing. Stan
  6. S

    Temperature at beginning of Electroweak Epoch?

    I concur that neutrino decoupling took place at a temperature of 1Mev (about 10^10K), but I was under the impression that neutrino freeze-out occurred at 1 second ATBB (after the Big Bang). Would this not place neutrino decoupling at the end of the Hadron Epoch (10^-6 to 1 second ATBB), rather...
  7. S

    Temperature at beginning of Electroweak Epoch?

    Thanks much, Chalnoth and Chronos. Your time is greatly appreciated. Yes, I DO understand that any numbers are inherently "model dependent." However, WikiPedia got their numbers SOMEWHERE. (I am assuming the model used to be Glashow's SO(5) model.) So I guess what I am asking is... "Using...
  8. S

    Temperature at beginning of Electroweak Epoch?

    Thank you for responding to my query, Chalnoth, It is much appreciated. However... I DO understand that, as you state, "In these inflation models, the temperature increase is caused by the decay of the inflaton field." However, what I'm after is precise (and I understand that this can only...
  9. S

    Temperature at beginning of Electroweak Epoch?

    Now, I understand that any discussion of the very early Universe is entirely hypothetical and to say it is extremely speculative is being generous. However, there are a few concepts regarding the Grand Unified Epoch, the Inflationary Epoch, and the Electroweak Epoch that I am hoping someone...
  10. S

    My Confusion Regarding the Strong Force

    Ahhhhhh. Now THAT explains it perfectly. The key point that I couldn't get straight in my head was what the gluons WITHIN the nucleon (which bind the quarks inside the proton or neutron) had to do with the pions (quark/antiquark particles) OUTSIDE of the nucleon. I just couldn't grasp where...
  11. S

    My Confusion Regarding the Strong Force

    Thanks for your prompt response to my query, mfb; it is much appreciated. I had to reread your answer a number of times, and then review the article on the van der Waals Force, but I believe I understand. Essentially, then, the Strong Force acting between quarks (and the gluons themselves) in...
  12. S

    My Confusion Regarding the Strong Force

    In an effort to clarify my question, allow me first of all to state what I believe I DO understand: All observed elementary particles are either fermions or bosons. Ignoring the Higgs boson (which gives other particles mass via the Higgs mechanism), there are four forces operating in the...
  13. S

    Questions Concerning The Planck Epoch

    Let me begin, Nikkkom, by saying that I deeply appreciate the time you took to generate your reply to my post. I found it to be extremely enlightening and, of course, it engendered questions. Please understand also that, when I throw out a question or make a comment, it is NOT meant to be...
  14. S

    Questions Concerning The Planck Epoch

    Stan>>> Holy cow! In looking at your avatar, I can only surmise that you ARE "The Dude!" In that case I must inevitably bow to superior knowledge and intellect! Take care and have a terrific evening, my friend. -Stan
  15. S

    Questions Concerning The Planck Epoch

    Stan>>> Again, my friend, you ARE right. This IS going beyond what science CAN justify at this point. Perhaps you feel that I'm being intellectually dishonest in my approach, but I'm going for a "grand scheme comprehensibility" and NOT a "proven-beyond-all-reasonable-doubt" chronology. You...
Back
Top