Steve4Physics's latest activity
-
SSteve4Physics reacted to Greg Bernhardt's post in the thread Announcement Easy ways you can support Physics Forums with
Like.
We are all members of an amazing community of science and math passionate people from all over the globe. However, "amazing" doesn't... -
SSteve4Physics replied to the thread Four L-shaped members: Mechanical Analysis Problem.Note that this is only justified because section DG is in equlibrium with only 2 forces acting on it. So: a) the 2 forces must have...
-
-
SSteve4Physics replied to the thread Four L-shaped members: Mechanical Analysis Problem.I agree. And well done for using LaTeX! A couple of points: 1. You have assumed, without justification, that some reactions are at 45...
-
SSteve4Physics reacted to jojosg's post in the thread Four L-shaped members: Mechanical Analysis Problem with Like.
Ok I think I got it. ##\sum F_x = 0 : \quad A_x - B_x = -F \tag{1}## ##\sum F_y = 0 : \quad A_y + B_y = 0 \tag{2}## ##\sum M_A = 0 ...
-
SSteve4Physics reacted to haruspex's post in the thread Four L-shaped members: Mechanical Analysis Problem with Like.
Very neat. Small typo: in your diagram under (1), you have -F at top right instead of F.
-
SSteve4Physics replied to the thread Four L-shaped members: Mechanical Analysis Problem.The Post #1 question seems to have only 20 minutes (exam’) working time advised, so a quick method is needed. There is a fairly quick...
-
-
SSteve4Physics replied to the thread Four L-shaped members: Mechanical Analysis Problem.Happy 2026 @haruspex! If B is pinned and A is on a horizontal track, I suspect this would happen: It satisfies the (intuitive)...
-
