Recent content by the-ever-kid

@tiny tim why did we find the relation b/w omega and theta

there was this question that i saw in a book and it also had an answer . (this is not a homework question) The Question was: \phi = \oint_s\boldsymbol{E}.\partial\boldsymbol{ A}\neq 0 on any surface \phi = \oint_s\boldsymbol{E}.\partial\boldsymbol{ A}=0 if the charge is outside a...

how is it related to the topic anyway?

Doesnt matter as long as the polarity is same

read a liitle about gauge smmetry on wikipedia went over my head mindboggling stuff couldn't understand a thing!

this one is but walter lewin later says that the result is charge sensitive how come as he initially took a charge specific case

how?

why did you post then ? BTW what is gauge symmetry

I've Had this doubt from a long time back : Being in high school my physics teach simply stated that No explanations given. To quench my thirst I went through books and things . I found one difinitive result : a: In this Video http://bit.ly/wl8-0204 Prof.Walter Lewin Says...

Yes you are! lolz ...see you are going and relating angles in entirely diferent planes you can't do that...coz' only angle between straight lies can be equated not angle between perpendicular lines ...the angle β that you considered is on the zx plane while the angle θ is in the zy plane..

http://puu.sh/pF94 hope it explains but the problem is that the tension is more than the weight of the rod

thank you chiro BTW i actually figured it out a little while ago... its like each point(x,y) become the origin and a vector like f(x)i+f(y)j is formed using it as the tail right? i did that for my point charge and got points f(x,y)=\frac{kQx}{(x^2 + y^2)^{3/2}},\frac{kQy}{(x^2 +...

I was about to do an experiment in Wolfram Mathematica like drawing electric field lines around a charged body and other arrangements. So i saw this nifty little Function for that very purpose called VectorPlot My Problem is that i don't know what the function does exactly i went through...

i believe you want to know why work is force*displacement(stretch as you called it), right?... Here's the deal, you cannot have another equation of work with powers greater than one or less than it for force or the displacement...why?...because work isn't something that you see in nature, as it...

could you make a diagram an post it here...