Mathematica Vector Fields Explaination.

the-ever-kid
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I was about to do an experiment in Wolfram Mathematica like drawing electric field lines around a charged body and other arrangements. So i saw this nifty little Function for that very purpose called VectorPlot

My Problem is that i don't know what the function does exactly i went through examples in the Wolfram Mathematica documentation but it did not mean anything to me.

I Read This Article : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VectorField.html

All i saw was that vector field meant something about the x-axis and some function on it

My Questions Are:

How Exactly are those small vector lines represented ?

Like In this Example where I was playing with the Function

http://puu.sh/pxch

what is happening to the x and y and what is making the vector lines change Size?

What is Giving it direction?

Is there an equation that is defining the vectors.?

Could anyone explain this to me...Please...BTW I am a high school student so can you explain it in a way that is undergrad level...
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    11.3 KB · Views: 479
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey the-ever-kid.

For this think of the (x,y) representation of the function at a particular point and how that corresponds with firstly the direction and secondly the magnitude.

As an example look at vectors at each point in your lattice (i.e. the lattice is just the points on the grid where your vectors are drawn from for each tail of the vector) and calculate on a calculator or otherwise the direction and the magnitude and compare it to what you see on screen.
 
thank you chiro BTW i actually figured it out a little while ago...

its like each point(x,y) become the origin and a vector like f(x)i+f(y)j is formed using it as the tail right?

i did that for my point charge and got points

f(x,y)=\frac{kQx}{(x^2 + y^2)^{3/2}},\frac{kQy}{(x^2 + y^2)^{3/2}}

Thanks,
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top