Recent content by thinker

I have the same question.:-)

Chinese. I speaker English a little.I am sorry.I am sorry.

I know that language is a very big obstacle.I try as far as possible to communicate with you.Hope that you can enough I help.Thank you!

I can't be subjected to the bias because English speak not good? Can't is not high to be subjected to the bias because of the quantum physics level? I think regardless is who we are equal.Regardless the level is high and low, regardless how English is.

my mother tongue is Chinese.

dextercioby, You did not see understand my formula, these are all not strange.Because you do not understand the information theory.It is the outcome that the information theory combines with the quantum mechanics.

I don't knew what you say.I don't read understand.I am sorry.

Perhaps I do not have what you study deep, but I am study QM and MATH and computer.

N_v=\frac {cosv{\pi}J_v(z)-J_{-v}(z)} {sinv \pi} Neumann function. Is he this Neumann? I am study QM and MATH and computer. D \vec{r}=dx\,dy\,dx in my formula. I think that my formula is right.You can point out it wrong at where? hehe..It is what I define.

[tex]N_v=\frac {cosv\piJ_v(z)-J_[-v}(z)}{sinv \pi} Neumann function. Is he this Neumann? I am study QM and math and computer

what is QM or SM? Is John von Neumann who is a mathematician?I don't know this name how to write on my mother tongue. My formula is correct!

dextercioby, You are to did not see which formula, because it is what I create.

I never heard" the von Neumann".May you tell me information for " the von Neumann"? It is a quantum statistics.That formula useds for measuring the uncertainty.I doubt it to become the inverse ratio with energy.

yes,My English is very what a mess, I am very sorry.haha.. Thank you to explain English for me.You explain very right. I learn the physics simultaneously to learn English simultaneously here. In fact, I think is not they whether the problem for “coherent” , also is not the problem for “need...

This problem look easy, so no one's answer.haha... The reason that I ask this problem, is because I think to have no interference the existence. I am to say theoretically have no interference existence.Look and usual theories antinomy. Don't know to have the person to do this to experiment?