timmdeeg's latest activity

In RQM, what matters is the transition probability between two events involving the particle. If there is a gravitational field, it is...

Thanks for clarifying, this I've been missing even though I'm watching chess games online sometimes.

Here is a quote from Rovelli. Taken from here https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-relational/ To me this is clear. The existence of...

Imagine that we were living in a simulation. Everything would look the same, but there would be no force of gravity, as such. A...

I'm still not clear with this. Wouldn't the assumption that "a particle may not exist beyond measurements/observations/interactions" be...

In fact, Rovelli developed the relational interpretation inspired by his work in loop quantum gravity. He discusses this in section 4(c)...

Note that the Rovelli paper above does not consider the question of the existence of an electron, as we have been discussing it here...

Mentioning GR I refer to "doesn't exist" in the quote in #59 obviously wrongly thinking that this relates to RQM.

My reasoning is that a non-existing particle can't feel gravity e.g. while its path is deflected by a mass.

Why not include General Relativity in these considerations? The wave-function doesn't feel gravity but a quantum object does as long as...

Doesn't already the deflection of particles, e.g. of a photon provided its status is a quantum object by a mass proof their existence?

After skimming through that you seem to refer to the question "Was soll da sonst existieren" (What should there exist otherwise) , but...

Since I know that you can read German, my discussion on Physikerboard with MBastieK of such a "don't exist" or "no well defined...

Yes, absolutely! That's why it's a matter open to interpretation. I'm not entirely sure I understand this question. According to the...

Sorry for a layman question in between. As I understood it a quantum object has no well defined properties unless it interacts. Isn't...