Recent content by Try Hard0

Okay Stephen, I am lost, so I will get to studying more with your statements in mind. When I come to understand what you are talking about, I will probably know what I am doing. Thanks.

Thanks for the explanation Stephen; I would want to use a 95% type probability/acceptance region. I take it that because the chances of all 3 judges rendering a decision against the Plaintiff falls outside the 95% region that the result is to be considered "suspect." But then that "confidence...

I will think about what you said, Stephen. I think I am supposed to assume something in the problem, like that the decision by the 11 judges was "unbiased," and that on the average the probability of a vote against the plaintiff is only 0.27, and that the probability of a vote against the...

In a recent federal appeals court case, a special 11-judge panel sat to decide on a certain particular legal issue under certain particular facts. Of the 11 judges, 3 were appointed by political party A, and 8 were appointed by political party B. Of the party-A judges, 2 of 3 sided with the...

Borek and Ygggdrasil; What you two have inspired me to do was go to Wikipedia and look up the Gay-Lussac law, which did not provide any kind of satisfaction. However, I ran into something called the "combined gas law" which does seem to lead me in the right direction. Check this out: The...

What is the trick to derive the ideal gas law and gas constant from the "combination" of Charles', Boyle's, and Avogado's laws? The general chemistry books I have seen tell me this is how they derived the ideal gas law and constant but they do not show how that is achieved. I tried to go about...