Derive the ideal gas law from Charles', Boyle's, and Avogadro's, how?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the ideal gas law from Boyle's, Charles', and Avogadro's laws. Participants explore the relationships between these gas laws and the challenges in combining them to arrive at the ideal gas law and the gas constant. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and mathematical relationships among the laws.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in combining the equations from Boyle's, Charles', and Avogadro's laws to derive the ideal gas law, questioning the correct placement of variables and constants.
  • Another participant suggests that the constants in Boyle's and Charles' laws depend on temperature, pressure, and the number of moles, indicating a need for a more complex understanding of these relationships.
  • A later reply introduces the combined gas law (PV/T = k) as a potential pathway to derive the ideal gas law, suggesting substituting R*n for k.
  • One participant proposes that if k = n*R, then Avogadro's law can be applied to connect the variables appropriately.
  • Another participant attempts to clarify the derivation by expressing how Charles' law can be modified to include dependencies on pressure and the number of moles, leading to the combined gas law.
  • A question is raised about the historical context of Avogadro's law and the measurement of the gas constant, prompting a discussion about Avogadro's contributions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a straightforward method to derive the ideal gas law from the three laws discussed. Multiple competing views and approaches remain, with some suggesting the need for additional laws or historical context.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the relationships among the gas laws and the dependencies of constants on various factors, indicating that assumptions about these relationships may not be universally applicable. The discussion also touches on the historical development of the gas constant and its association with Avogadro.

Try Hard0
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
What is the trick to derive the ideal gas law and gas constant from the "combination" of Charles', Boyle's, and Avogado's laws? The general chemistry books I have seen tell me this is how they derived the ideal gas law and constant but they do not show how that is achieved. I tried to go about the process and failed. Let me show you what I did and maybe you can help me out.

The book says:
Boyle's Law => V = k/P (the constant is k, and the units seem to be L*atm)
Charle's Law => V = bT (b is the constant, and the units seem to be L/Kelvin)
Avogadro's Law => V = an (a is the constant, and the units seem to be L/mol)

But if you try to combine these three laws in a straightforward fashion I think you will fail as I did. What I tried was to multiply Boyle's and Charle's equations and then divide that result by Avogadro's equation to get V = (k/P)(bT)/(an) . . . but that is not right! (Note: n needs to be in the numerator on the right side of the equation). (Additionally, the units won't work-out for the ideal gas constant R, where kb/a = R has units of (L*atm*mol)/Kelvin which is wrong, i.e. should be (L*atm)/(mol*Kelvin).)

So, what is the trick I am missing here? Is there a simple and straightforward way to derive the ideal gas law and gas constant from the "combination" of Boyle's, Charles', and Avogadro's laws? Or is the process actually quite involved, and for that reason most general chemistry texts (i.e. all that I have seen, including physical chemistry texts) avoid providing the "derivation"? Alternatively, does someone know of a book or a webpage or someplace I can look to find this derivation of the ideal gas law and constant from Charles', Boyle's, and Avogadro's laws?

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Why do you think "an" needs to be in numerator?
 
It's important to remember that the Boyle's law "constant" k depends on temperature and the number of moles, the Charles' law "constant" depends on pressure and the number of moles, and the Avogadro's law "constant" depends on temperature and pressure. You may also need the Gay-Lussac law which states that, for constant volume and number of moles, temperature is directly proportional to pressure.

Perhaps it might be useful exercise to first derive these laws from the ideal gas law.

Finally, I will note that while the ideal gas law was originally discovered by combining these laws, which were derived from experiments, modern chemists can now derive the ideal gas law from first principles (i.e. using only the theoretical assumptions of the kinetic theory of gases). The methods used for this theoretical derivation are somewhat complex and would be taught in advanced university chemistry courses (specifically a course called statistical mechanics).
 
Borek and Ygggdrasil;
What you two have inspired me to do was go to Wikipedia and look up the Gay-Lussac law, which did not provide any kind of satisfaction. However, I ran into something called the "combined gas law" which does seem to lead me in the right direction. Check this out:

The combined gas law says: PV/T = k (a constant)

They did give the derivation (I think) and it looks like they got this "combined gas law" from the Boyle's, Charles', and Gay-Lussac laws, but not from Avogadro's law.

Anyway, my thinking is that I can take the combined gas law as derived and substitute R*n for k.

Look like I'm on the right track?

I assume the units of the constant k are atm*L/Kelvin, and just multiplying that by 1/mol would give the correct units of R and everything unit-wise cancels out nicely between the factors P, V, T, and n with the units of R.

But the n just came out of nowhere. But maybe that is okay here? I mean, PV/T are dependent upon the number of moles (n) too, right? I'm a little unsure of myself here though. Any words of wisdom for me?
 
You are on the right track. If k=n*R that's the place to apply Avogadro's.

Look at it from this perspective: long ago there were several laws, and a good physicist should be able to see they can be all parts of something more universal. It is possible to combine them and experimentally check if that combined equation doesn't hold. And lo, it does! That's not the only moment in the history of science when partial results were combined into general theory.
 
Here's my attempt at a somewhat more clear explanation of the derivation. Let's start with Charles's Law. This law states that at constant pressure (P) and number of moles (n), volume (V) and temperature (T) are directly proportional. Put mathematically, this means V = cT, where c is a constant. Now, experiments show that this relationship breaks down if you add or remove gas from the system or change the pressure, indicating that c is a function of n and P. Therefore, we can write:

V = c(n,P)*T

How does the function c depend on n and P? For this, we can turn to Boyle's law and Avogadro's law. For Boyle's law, V = b/P when n and T are constant. If we look at our previous expression from Charles's law:

V = c(n,P)*T

We can see that this will fit Boyle's law if the function c is of the form c(n,P) = a(n)/P, where a is some function dependent on n. This gives us the expression:

V = a(n)*T/P

If we treat T and n as constants, we can recover Boyle's law where b = a(n)*T (since n and T are constants, so is b).

Rearranging this expression, we can get the combined gas law:

PV/T = a(n)

That is, at a constant number of moles of gas, PV/T equals a constant. Similar reasoning using Avogadro's law can show how the function a(n) depends on n. Experiments are required to determine the constant of proportionality that pops our (R, the ideal gas constant).
 
Gentlemen:

Is there any record of Avogadro's laboratory notes, that he may at that 'time' of this steps- procedure in developing his law and the R factor?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K