Recent content by X53

oh, now this is very interesting. please elaborate.

but how could one account for what he was doing in regards to this? what was he demonstrating?

but why would he bring up zeno's paradox. it doesn't have anything to do with physics, right?

Hi. thanks for the response. yes. it was projectile motion, so it was a parabola. and it was general physics, regents level. I don't remember the homeworks assigned, but it didn't deviate from the standard pattern, I'm sure of it. I do remember many names of classmates, but I'm not going to...

I was in physics class a while ago and my teacher had the trajectory of a projectile on the board. he was marking off points on it, and next to each point, right after he marked it off, he wrote 1/2 next to it, then crossed it off while saying "1/2", then proceeded like that, marking off the...

Please elaborate on your math.

Here is the second link (Domino Valdano's explanation): Yes, you are missing something very important: 4 more boxes. There might be a way to explain it using fewer than 6 boxes, but the simplest and most straightforward way I'm aware of involves 6 boxes. You certainly can't do it with only 2...

Here you go: Yes, you are missing something very important: 4 more boxes. There might be a way to explain it using fewer than 6 boxes, but the simplest and most straightforward way I'm aware of involves 6 boxes. You certainly can't do it with only 2 boxes. With 2 boxes, there is no indication...

He says: "Now here's the bombshell that should drop your jaw: you notice that when you open boxes A and C' (or C and A'), they only agree 50% of the time! Why is this shocking? Because 85% of 85% is 72%! If A and A' agree with B and B’ 85% of the time and B and B' agree with C and C' 85% of the...

Can someone please explain how the author, Domino Valdano, derives the percentages explaining quantum entanglement? The original post is by Thomas Ulrich. Any help would be greatly appreciated. first click on my link posted here, then once in it just scroll to the bottom of the post and...

Why doesn't anyone answer?

Suppose that the force needed to push a disc down on top of another disk = weight x g, then the two discs are charged with opposite quantities of electricity, then the weight removed, and still the discs remain together due to the force of attraction between the discs; so then the electric force...