Published electroweak coincidences

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 2K views
arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,500
Reaction score
204
TL;DR
I will keep updating the table, but paste any references (arxiv or journals) in the thread
I have been told of a new preprint of Emilio Torrente-Lujan that revisits his publication Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2744, arXiv:1209.0474 of coincidences in the electroweak scale. If I recall correctly we revised in the forum a lot of them, at the time of preprints, but I have not tracked which ones have been actually published and follow. Dare someone to do a table?

EquationpreprintjournalPF earlier mention
Veltman conditionActa Phys. Polon. B 12 (1981) 437
[tex]m_H^2 + m_W^2 +m_Z^2 + \Sigma_{f=q,l} m_f^2 = v^2[/tex]arXiv:1305.4208unpublishedhere
[tex]4m_H^2=2m_T^2=v^2[/tex]arXiv:1409.0492https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1063776115030218PF earlier mention
EquationpreprintjournalPF earlier mention

[/tex]
[tex][/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1791308711892.webp

I. Alikhanov, "Novel dependence between neutrino mass splittings strongly supported by initial JUNO results" arXiv:2610.06738 (October 5, 2026)). Not yet published. No prior PF discussion.

This updates (with new higher precision data from JUNO): I. Alikhanov, "Another relation among the neutrino mass-squared differences?", arXiv:2601.18781 (January 26, 2026), which is the first time that this coincidence has been mentioned of which I am aware.
 
Screenshot 2026-10-06 at 12.16.57 PM.webp

R. Gatto, G. Sartori, and M. Tonin, “Weak self-masses, Cabibbo angle, and broken SU(2)×SU(2),” Phys. Lett. B 28, 128 (1968); R. J. Oakes, “SU(2)×SU(2) breaking and the Cabibbo angle,” Phys. Lett. B 29, 683 (1969). Full text (equations are handwritten and images of them are provided here) at https://cds.cern.ch/record/939987/files/CM-P00057857.pdf

Not aware of prior PF discussion.
 
|Vtd|2=|Vcb|3 and

|Vub|2|Vus|=|Vcb|4

arXiv:2007.12695
Y. Grossman and J. T. Ruderman, “CKM substructure,” JHEP 01, 143 (2021)
No PF discussion of which I am aware.