Things that are getting tiresome to see in scifi (whichever medium)

  • Thread starter Thread starter sbrothy
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
52 replies · 3K views · last reply
I liked the WOPR of Wargames and the Star Trek M5 computers. Their lighting effects were awesome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good computer must have blinking lights.
I also like a good voice; perhaps HAL was the best.
 
Gordianus said:
A good computer must have blinking lights.
I also like a good voice; perhaps HAL was the best.
I like how Kubrick didn't go with blinking lights here.
 
Paul Colby said:
The PDP-8 I used to collect photon counting data had a bunch to display registers.
That is actually kinda cool. The 1960s computers look good. It is just science fiction set in the future that still use blinking lights is kinda cheesy. Now, a supercomputer with a large screen on the shorter side of the rack displaying computing stats and CPU graphs would look cool.
 
Paul Colby said:
Or the advanced civilization they stumble upon can't imagine taking the risks or making the personal sacrifices needed to make such a voyage, even with their current technology.
China was like that. They sent a huge convoy to Africa in 1408 but when they came back such travel was made illegal.

Japan isolated themselves for 250 years.
 
Tiresome to see? Long long ago I got fed up with ray guns, space ships, and star empires in endless war. It's old fashioned. 17th century.

I read history instead because it shows more "imagination." It isn't constrained by plausibility.

I sympathize with SF authors though. Come up with something too imaginative and it won't sell. Stick with cliches. Music, same.
 
Last edited:
sbrothy said:
"Something located in the constellation X."

You people have any pet peeves in this genre?

DaveC426913 said:
This always comes down to the audience and story telling.
You and I know that a constellation is only meaningful from Earth, and that it does not define radial distance.

But, in terms of story-telling, how much time should they spend on accuracy, as opposed to keeping the story moving? Is radial distance necessary for the plot?

That one annoys me a bit too - since in sci-fi there's necessarily a lot of inaccuracy and suspension of disbelief, it's an easy one to get right/accurate. It was done well and was useful as a plot point (as opposed to throw-away technobabble) in Project Hail Marry, where the characters tell each other where they are from with pop-up 3D models.

And I also liked how Men in Black goes the other way to leverage the inaccuracy of the trope itself with "the galaxy in Orion's belt."
 
One problem glossed over in Star Trek is warp speed. Youtube video showed examples of warp speed and how long it took to clear orbits and then the solar system and you begin to see the problem.

Thats not even considering the relativistic effects of aging as they travel from planet to planet where generations could come and go before they return.
 
jedishrfu said:
One problem glossed over in Star Trek is warp speed. Youtube video showed examples of warp speed and how long it took to clear orbits and then the solar system and you begin to see the problem.
I dont see how its a problem.
They often take just a few hours or less to clear the solar system going at a leisurely warp two.
jedishrfu said:
Thats not even considering the relativistic effects of aging as they travel from planet to planet where generations could come and go before they return.
Pretty sure warp bubble physics ( including Alcubierre drive) is immune to relativistic time dilation.
 
One trope is space battles being like naval battles in WW2. Star Trek is like battle in the Atlantic with cloaked enemy ship lurking around like U-Boats. Star Wars is like carrier battles of the Pacific, with one little space ship blowing up the huge death star with a single hit, like Richard Halsey Best did with the Akagi.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
AlexB23 said:
Well, maybe aliens as being portrayed as far superior to humans. Would be nice if some sci-fi took place on an alien world that has yet to make FTL travel work and have similar tech to us. Maybe they have electric supersonic airliners, some AI, and photonic computers, but they could have the same struggles as humans do. Only drawback is that the aliens would not be able to contact humans, unless they live close to Earth or future humans visit them.

TLDR: Movies and books need to stop making aliens look like the bad guys or saviors or humanity.
Fred Hamilton’s books have a little of it all. The “dead returnimg from limbo”-part is pretty silly but it works in context and adds a good deal of humor to the epic story.

EDIT: Blessed by an Angel.
 
sbrothy said:
You people have any pet peeves in this genre?

When the writing/script ties itself in knots trying to create a reality-based explanation for fanciful technology.

Current offender: "Dark Matter". Could not force myself to watch past episode 4.
 
Andy Resnick said:
When the writing/script ties itself in knots trying to create a reality-based explanation for fanciful technology.

Current offender: "Dark Matter". Could not force myself to watch past episode 4.
Strange? All my Hilbert spaces look like a corridor lined with doorways leading to death.
 
Reverse the polarity!

My gripe is basically when the thing is a technobabble answer that just means ''okay try something else now that we just made up'' with zero pre-explanation or logic behind it.

EDIT: Oh! Oh! And cables. In extremely futuristic settings. At that point we should've invented wireless already. I get they look tech-y, and they can be more reliable (in this day and age) but surely we would've perfected some other means of invisible transfer in this futuristic, hypothetical world.
 
Reply
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: sbrothy and AlexB23
Rodney182 said:
Reverse the polarity!

My gripe is basically when the thing is a technobabble answer that just means ''okay try something else now that we just made up'' with zero pre-explanation or logic behind it.

EDIT: Oh! Oh! And cables. In extremely futuristic settings. At that point we should've invented wireless already. I get they look tech-y, and they can be more reliable (in this day and age) but surely we would've perfected some other means of invisible transfer in this futuristic, hypothetical world.
Yeah, that one is the worst trope in science fiction.
 
Reply
  • Agree
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rodney182 and sbrothy
A.T. said:
I think this is specific to writing for the screen, and mosty motivated by production costs. The other cheap alternative is pure-energy-aliens represented by some light effects.
The film "Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets", have some pretty original aliens in its cold open. It's a pretty obvious copy of the comic "Linda and Valentin" and I haven't seen all of it because I bump into the "Planet in Constallation X" trope.

Try searching tvtropes.org for "Constallations as Locations"

(I'm on this weird public computer where I can't copy/paste.)
 
Rodney182 said:
[...]

EDIT: Oh! Oh! And cables. In extremely futuristic settings. At that point we should've invented wireless already. I get they look tech-y, and they can be more reliable (in this day and age) but surely we would've perfected some other means of invisible transfer in this futuristic, hypothetical world.
... or ar least fiberoptics. Although who's to say that the cables you see aren't exactly that? :woot:
 
sbrothy said:
Try searching tvtropes.org
This is a cruel, cruel thing to do to someone. Send them down that rabbit hole, to have them emerge only once they are emaciated and dehydrated. :oldbiggrin:
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sbrothy and Rodney182
DaveC426913 said:
This is a cruel, cruel thing to do to someone. Send them down that rabbit hole, to have them emerge only once they are emaciated and dehydrated. :oldbiggrin:
Indeed. It’s like sending someone on an intentional wikiwalk they’ll come back being an expert in train gears or sniper ammunition. Only, I agree, tvtropes is worse. :smile:
 
AlexB23 said:
That is true. But maybe they lack one tech that they struggle with. And also, it would be cool to see a genre of sci-fi where aliens never contact humans, but the story is set on how the aliens go about their lives or solve crises. For instance, humans have mostly solved the ozone hole by the 2000s. What if aliens did not solve their ozone hole issue, cos their fertilizers and cars emit NOx? They would probably need to wear UV suits and have covered sidewalks. Cars would maybe be driveless and drop people off at their locations. Most activity would happen during the twilight. So, ET may have solved CO2 emissions, but they struggle with NOx.

Another thing: Imagine the alien version of WWII was fought with cloud seeding. That would be an interesting take on ethics of weather control.

In simple terms, sci-fi could explore ethical dilemmas by using isolated alien civilizations with similar tech to ours to push the plot forward.
Hah. I get @symbolipoint ’s reaction. That was quite a mental jump.
 
A.T. said:
Not showing the aliens is also a clever move to make a movie timeless, regardless of how the idea of an alien changes.
Those stories just feel…. incomplete or unsatisfactory….

IMHO