George Ellis corrects Leonard Susskind

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
George Ellis has found an apparent mistake in Lenny Susskind's recent book "The Cosmic Landscape" about the multitude of string theory vacua and ideas of a multiverse.

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603266

Ellis is an interesting figure, this thread has some background and comment on a recent article Ellis wrote for an Elsevier Handbook.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=911961#post911961

Ellis is co-author, with Stephen Hawking, of a well-known reference "The Large-Scale Structure of Spacetime"

Regarding Susskind, he posts the following note:

On horizons and the cosmic landscape
George F R Ellis

"Susskind claims in his recent book The Cosmic Landscape that evidence for the existence and nature of 'pocket universes' in a multiverse would be available via detailed study of the Cosmic Blackbody Background Radiation. I point out that apart from any other queries one might have about the chain of argument involved, this claim is invalid because it rests on a confusion between the nature of a particle horizon and an event horizon in cosmology."

Ellis gives this link to a passage of Susskind's book containing the questionable claim:
http://www.twbookmark.com/books/28/0316155799/chapter_excerpt22014.html

[my comment: this seems to be a decent way for the arxiv to work, no blogs or trackback mechanism needed---if you find an error, simply post a note on arxiv politely pointing it out]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is definitely an interesting find! It's great that George Ellis was able to point out this mistake in Susskind's book. It's always important to be sure to double check the accuracy of any claims made in books and articles, especially when it comes to scientific theories. I'm glad that Ellis was able to provide a link to the specific passage in Susskind's book containing the questionable claim, so that people can look into it further. Thanks for sharing this info!
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top