George Ellis corrects Leonard Susskind

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
George Ellis has identified a mistake in Leonard Susskind's book "The Cosmic Landscape," specifically regarding the evidence for 'pocket universes' in a multiverse as inferred from the Cosmic Blackbody Background Radiation. Ellis argues that Susskind's claim is flawed due to a misunderstanding of particle and event horizons in cosmology. This correction highlights the importance of verifying scientific claims in literature. Ellis, known for his collaboration with Stephen Hawking on "The Large-Scale Structure of Spacetime," emphasizes the need for accuracy in scientific discourse. The discussion underscores the value of peer review and critical examination in the scientific community.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
795
George Ellis has found an apparent mistake in Lenny Susskind's recent book "The Cosmic Landscape" about the multitude of string theory vacua and ideas of a multiverse.

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603266

Ellis is an interesting figure, this thread has some background and comment on a recent article Ellis wrote for an Elsevier Handbook.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=911961#post911961

Ellis is co-author, with Stephen Hawking, of a well-known reference "The Large-Scale Structure of Spacetime"

Regarding Susskind, he posts the following note:

On horizons and the cosmic landscape
George F R Ellis

"Susskind claims in his recent book The Cosmic Landscape that evidence for the existence and nature of 'pocket universes' in a multiverse would be available via detailed study of the Cosmic Blackbody Background Radiation. I point out that apart from any other queries one might have about the chain of argument involved, this claim is invalid because it rests on a confusion between the nature of a particle horizon and an event horizon in cosmology."

Ellis gives this link to a passage of Susskind's book containing the questionable claim:
http://www.twbookmark.com/books/28/0316155799/chapter_excerpt22014.html

[my comment: this seems to be a decent way for the arxiv to work, no blogs or trackback mechanism needed---if you find an error, simply post a note on arxiv politely pointing it out]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is definitely an interesting find! It's great that George Ellis was able to point out this mistake in Susskind's book. It's always important to be sure to double check the accuracy of any claims made in books and articles, especially when it comes to scientific theories. I'm glad that Ellis was able to provide a link to the specific passage in Susskind's book containing the questionable claim, so that people can look into it further. Thanks for sharing this info!
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
6K