Prove by induction that nCk is always a natural number

  • Thread starter Thread starter nietzsche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Natural
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 4K views
nietzsche
Messages
185
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove by induction that [tex]\binom{n}{k}[/tex] is always a natural number.


Homework Equations



The problem requires that we use the fact that
[tex]\binom{n+1}{k}=\binom{n}{k-1}+\binom{n}{k}\tag{1}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, the first part of this question requires a proof of (1), which was easy enough just using
[tex]\binom{n}{k}=\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}[/tex]

What I'm not sure of is how to perform the induction. I took the base case of n=1.
[tex]\binom{1}{0}=1[/tex]
[tex]\binom{1}{1}=1[/tex]

and from (1) we obtain that, with n=1, k=1,
[tex]\binom{n+1}{k}=\binom{2}{1}=1+1=2[/tex]

Can I now say that [tex]\binom{n+1}{k}[/tex] is always the sum of two natural numbers, and is therefore natural?

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi nietzsche! :smile:

I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill :redface:

to prove (7 5) is an integer, all you need is that (6 5) and (6 4) are integers …

so just be systematic in what order you do the proof

(and remember it doesn't work for k = 0, so you have to prove it for all (n 0) separately, not just for (1 0) :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi nietzsche! :smile:

I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill :redface:

to prove (7 5) is an integer, all you need is that (6 5) and (6 4) are integers …

so just be systematic in what order you do the proof

(and remember it doesn't work for k = 0, so you have to prove it for all (n 0) separately, not just for (1 0) :wink:)

I've no clue as to how to prove that (6 5) and (6 4) are integers. Do I still have to consider a base case of n=1? This question is driving me mad.
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=61891

I found this, which is the same question. According to this,

[tex] \text{Let }n=0.<br /> \text{ If }k=0,<br /> \binom{0}{0} = 1<br /> \text{ (by definition)}<br /> \text{ and if }k \not= 0,<br /> \binom{0}{k} = 0<br /> \text{ (by definition).}[/tex]
[tex] \text{Since}<br /> \binom{n+1}{k} = \binom{n}{k-1}+\binom{n}{k},<br /> \text{ it follows from induction that for all }<br /> n, \binom{n}{k}<br /> \text{is an integer.}[/tex]

Not sure if what I'm saying is valid. What do yall think?
 
Yes, if you're happy with (n k) = 0 for n < k, then that proof is correct.

But you need to specify the ordering …

Start: "It works for n = 0 and for any k, and then by induction on n … " :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Yes, if you're happy with (n k) = 0 for n < k, then that proof is correct.

But you need to specify the ordering …

Start: "It works for n = 0 and for any k, and then by induction on n … " :smile:

Thank you very much.