Can there be negative dimensions in our world?

  • Thread starter Thread starter setuxas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of negative dimensions, specifically theorizing about -1D, -2D, and -3D. The original poster suggests that these negative dimensions represent non-existent forms defined by the presence of surrounding positive dimensional objects. For instance, -1D is described as a blank line defined by existing lines, while -2D and -3D follow a similar logic with squares and three-dimensional objects, respectively. A key point is that these non-existent objects must be central to the surrounding positive dimensions. However, a response emphasizes that dimensions are primarily a framework for describing existing objects and phenomena, and the original idea is framed more as a method rather than a theory. The response also notes that personal theories and non-mainstream speculation are not aligned with the forum's guidelines, leading to the thread being locked.
setuxas
I've been reading all about dimensions and started theorising myself , can there be something like -1D? The theory I came up is this:

The Minus Dimensions don't have an object (it doesn't exist), but it's form is created by the location, which is other specific positive D objects. For example: -1D - A blank line surrounded by other lines which exist. -2D - A non-existant form of a 2D square created by other 2D squares, which exist. -3D - A non existent 3D object surrounded by other 3D objects. The most important rule is that the non-existant object must be the center of the created location.

Basicly this would explain a lot of other events.

Tell me what you think

- Liutauras
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
(it doesn't exist) about sums it up.
 
Objects (and things like force and momentum) exist and are what they are.

Dimensions just provide a way to describe objects (and other things). Any dimensions necessary and useful to describe the real world can be created by the person doing the explaining - provided they're understandable and actually make the description better.

So your idea wouldn't be a theory; it would be a method. It isn't totally clear how your method would explain other events, though. (Don't fall in love with unique methods that just don't add much to what you're trying to say or acocmplish.)
 
Thread locked.

The main purpose of Physics Forums is to teach and discuss the current state of knowledge in science, math, and technology; personal theories and non-mainstream speculation are against our guidelines.
 
Every day we learn new things. Sometimes it's just a small fact or realization. No matter how trivial or random, let's start recording our daily lessons. Please start off with "Today I learned". Keep commentary to a minimum and just LIKE posts. I'll start! Today I learned that you clean up a white hat by spraying some cleaner with bleach on it (rinse before putting it back on your head!)

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top