T'Hooft video talk: Conformal Gravity - BH complementarity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Video
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Gerard t'Hooft's video talk on Conformal Gravity explores the concept of black hole complementarity, emphasizing that reality may fundamentally possess conformal symmetry. He presents a model comparing two perspectives: Alice, who observes Hawking radiation without seeing anything fall into the black hole, and the Mad Hatter, who experiences only infalling matter. t'Hooft concludes that these differing views share the same light cone structure and causality, differing only by a gauge transformation. His radical approach suggests the absence of singularities in black holes, challenging traditional views in quantum gravity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conformal symmetry in physics
  • Familiarity with black hole thermodynamics and Hawking radiation
  • Knowledge of gauge transformations in quantum field theory
  • Basic principles of canonical quantum gravity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the paper "The Conformal Constraint in Canonical Quantum Gravity" by Gerard t'Hooft (arXiv:1011.0061)
  • Examine "Quantum gravity without space-time singularities or horizons" by Gerard t'Hooft (arXiv:0909.3426)
  • Research the implications of conformal invariance in quantum field theories
  • Explore the concept of gauge transformations in the context of black hole physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and students interested in advanced theoretical concepts related to black holes and conformal symmetry.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
t'Hooft video talk: Conformal Gravity -- BH complementarity

http://pirsa.org/12050061
Conformal Gravity and Black Hole Complementarity
Speaker(s): Gerard t'Hooft
Date: 11/05/2012 - 4:40 pm
Collection: Conformal Nature of the Universe

Definitely worth watching at least some if not all of this talk. I'll try to find some published papers that relate to it. If you know of some already please post the links.
The slides and presentation are excellent though the audio level is a bit low, so it demands careful listening.

Imagine that nature is fundamentally conformal. Things have definite size for us only because that symmetry is broken by our adopting a flat world perspective. But suppose that reality has that basic symmetry. Then he models a black hole and compares two coordinatizations, from two different points of view.
A. from the standpoint of Alice outside who never sees anything fall in and only sees Hawk. rad. come out.
MH. and as witnessed by the Mad Hatter who falls in and only sees other infalling stuff and never sees anything get out.

Then he says in his conformal setup these two views of reality SHARE THE SAME LIGHTCONE structure, the same view of causality. And he calculates that these two very different views of the same reality differ only by a GAUGE TRANSFORMATION.

't Hooft's scheme of a BH seems radical to me in part because there is no singularity, as far as I can tell. I had to stop watching halfway thru the first time. Will look for some relevant papers and get back to it later today.

Does anyone who has already watched the talk have comment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


These papers may give clues about how 't Hooft got to the ideas in his present talk. I'll copy the abstract of only the most recent one:

arXiv:1011.0061
The Conformal Constraint in Canonical Quantum Gravity
Gerard 't Hooft

arXiv:1009.0669
Probing the small distance structure of canonical quantum gravity using the conformal group
Gerard 't Hooft

arXiv:0909.3426
Quantum gravity without space-time singularities or horizons
Gerard 't Hooft

http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.0061
The Conformal Constraint in Canonical Quantum Gravity
Gerard 't Hooft
(Submitted on 30 Oct 2010)
Perturbative canonical quantum gravity is considered, when coupled to a renormalizable model for matter fields. It is proposed that the functional integral over the dilaton field should be disentangled from the other integrations over the metric fields. This should generate a conformally invariant theory as an intermediate result, where the conformal anomalies must be constrained to cancel out. When the residual metric is treated as a background, and if this background is taken to be flat, this leads to a novel constraint: in combination with the dilaton contributions, the matter lagrangian should have a vanishing beta function. The zeros of this beta function are isolated points in the landscape of quantum field theories, and so we arrive at a denumerable, or perhaps even finite, set of quantum theories for matter, where not only the coupling constants, but also the masses and the cosmological constant are all fixed, and computable, in terms of the Planck units.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
15K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K