MHB -14.1 ....standard deviation of 15......

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deviation
AI Thread Summary
IQ scores follow a normal distribution with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. The discussion focuses on determining the proportion of individuals with IQs above 130, which is two standard deviations above the mean. It is established that approximately 95% of the population falls within two standard deviations of the mean, leaving about 5% in the tails. Since the question specifically asks for the proportion above 130, the answer is 2.5%. Understanding the normal distribution is crucial for interpreting these statistics accurately.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Given IQ scores are approximately normally distributed with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15,
the proportion of people with IQs above 130 is:
$ a.\ 95\% \quad b.\ 68\% \quad c.\ 5\% \quad d.\ 2.5\% \quad e.\ 12\%$

ok its been some moons since I looked at a standard deviation graph
so my choice would be by dice.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not a "standard deviation graph", it's a normal distribution graph.

130 is two standard deviations above the mean. How much of the data will be within two standard deviations from the mean? So how much for each tail?
 
=
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top