4+ spatial dimensions and how to manage them

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of beings existing in 5 spatial dimensions and their interactions with a 3-dimensional Earth. Participants explore theoretical implications of higher dimensions, particularly in relation to architecture, movement, and the nature of geography in a 5-dimensional context. The conversation includes speculative ideas about how these beings might perceive and interact with lower-dimensional spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their story involving 5-dimensional beings, suggesting that their presence leads to unusual transformations in architecture and geography, with a focus on the implications of having more geography that is largely barren.
  • Another participant proposes an analogy of a 3-dimensional finger interacting with a 2-dimensional world to illustrate how 5-dimensional beings might interact with lower dimensions, suggesting they could step 'out' of the universe.
  • Questions arise regarding the dependence of movement speed on scale, with one participant seeking clarification on this point and relating it to the map-globe analogy.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about their previous statement regarding scale and movement, indicating a lack of clarity in their reasoning.
  • A later contribution discusses the importance of curvature in higher dimensions, using a 2-dimensional manifold as an analogy to explain how curvature affects perception and movement, while cautioning against nonintuitive aspects of higher-dimensional geometry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints and uncertainties regarding the implications of higher dimensions, particularly in relation to movement and perception. There is no consensus on the specifics of how these concepts apply, and some points remain contested or unclear.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved questions about the nature of matter in higher dimensions and the effects of curvature versus scale on movement and perception. The discussion reflects a range of speculative ideas without definitive conclusions.

Khantazm
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Basically, I'm writing a story that involves beings of 5 spatial dimensions visiting Earth. And when I say "writing" I mean "putting thoughts down on paper as they come to me" or almost that, i.e. not much thought has gone into world-building. Mostly 5-dimensionality manifests in crazy transformations of architecture and vehicles, and psychodelic walking into completely different places while apparently staying still. Also, as a map gets infinite increase in stuff when it's tranformed into a globe, the 5d Earth has much more geography than our 3d Earth, but for some reason most of the extra geography is barren, except for, lately, some lichen and giant fungi (a half-formed reason for that might be that only those fungi have a mutation allowing them to travel in additional directions).

Additionally, the story is inspired by Doctor Who, so the 5d beings look completely like humans (except maybe for wings :confused: that are maybe the part of them that extends into the other dimensions, or there is more to them than is seen:rolleyes:)

And finally, 5 dimensions could be an overkill, but 4 seemed to be too pedestrian at the start, plus if I did 4 it would be too easy to assume that I mean space and time, but they make plotting a mess, because as I understand it, at any moment my characters can end up anywhere in space (if not in time, but I didn't want to copy Doctor Who completely).

It all seems to me to be almost incoherent, but I wonder, if via a few generous cuts and edits, the world could make a bit more sense*, and if anyone here would have any suggestions as to how that might be accomplished.

*That is, put more "science" into "science fiction".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine pushing your finger into a 2d world from 'above'. (Which can't be experienced by the 2d observers in the 2d world) From their perspective there is a small point that magically appears out of nowhere and gradually expands as you keep pushing the tip of your finger through. To me, that's what someone visiting a world with less dimensions than themselves can do. Your 5d beings can, quite literally, step 'out' of the universe through the 4th or 5th dimension just like you can pull your finger 'up' out of the 2d world. This may or may not allow them to move about quickly, it depends on scale and such.
 
Wut wut wut! How does it depend on scale and such? Please clarify! When I compare to the map-globe analogy, there would only be an increase in speed if there were a tunnel. By the way, does anyone know what shape matter tends to take under gravity in 4 (or 5) dimensions? Hypersphere?
 
Khantazm said:
Wut wut wut! How does it depend on scale and such? Please clarify!

I don't know really, I don't quite remember what I was thinking when I put that in. Now that I think about it, it doesn't make much sense, so I'd just ignore it.
 
Scale may not matter, but curvature does. If you visualise a 2-d manifold embedded in 3-space, the manifold can be completely flat, or it can be curved. The latter is far more interesting, in that it affects the appearance and speed of sections/projections onto the manifold.

Let's say your 2-d manifold is curved sharply like a U or V in the middle, between two infinitely large flat expanses on either side. You are a 3-d being playing with 2-d creatures (let's unoriginally call them "Flatlanders" (FLs) after Abbott) that are unaware of your existence. A 3-d cylinder that enters the flat part of the manifold (planar) orthogonally will appear as a circle to the FLs. If it starts moving (in 3-d) at a constant speed parallel to the 2-d manifold, it will appear as a circle moving at constant velocity.

Now when that moving cylinder hits the curved part of the 2-d manifold, interesting things will happen. It will suddenly become an ellipse (or more generally, a conic section of some sort). It will also appear to suddenly speed up from the perspective of a FL, because it is traversing more of their space in the same amount of time.

We can only imagine 3-d projections to 2-d, but you can try to extrapolate the same sort of thinking to higher dimensions. But some things about higher dimensions are nonintuitive. For example, in 4-d, two planes can actually meet at a single point (in 3-d, two non-parallel planes necessarily meet at a line). So beware of traps like this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K