A code found in equations for superstring theory huh?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discovery of binary code patterns within equations of superstring theory, suggesting a connection to error-correcting codes developed by Claude Shannon in the 1940s. Participants express confusion regarding the implications of this discovery, questioning whether it indicates that the code was merely rediscovered rather than created anew. The conversation also touches on the theoretical nature of string theory and its potential implications for understanding reality, with skepticism about the validity of string theory as a scientific model.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of superstring theory concepts
  • Familiarity with error-correcting codes and their applications
  • Knowledge of Claude Shannon's contributions to information theory
  • Basic grasp of theoretical physics and its methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of error-correcting codes in quantum computing
  • Explore the fundamentals of superstring theory and its mathematical framework
  • Investigate the historical context of Claude Shannon's work and its impact on modern coding theory
  • Examine critiques of string theory and alternative models in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, computer scientists, and anyone interested in the intersection of information theory and advanced physics concepts.

Lightingbird
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand what I have just learned. So some sort of browser based code or binary was discovered in equations for super-string theory. I have a few questions since I am very confused.

If code was created by Claude Shannon in the 1940's, then how could it be in this code? Does this mean that maybe this person just discovered the existing code instead of create it? Can this be tested or is it all just theoretical?

Finally, if these class of block linear self dual error self correcting codes exist and later string theory is found real, what does this mean for the whole picture? Could reality be some sort of virtual reality or maybe something else?

Maybe some of these can't be answered but I'd like some insight and opinions either way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=q1LCVknKUJ4

From about 3min 40 in he appears to be saying that what looks like error correcting codes/patterns turn up in the equations. He's not saying it's html or Java or anything like that. I don't think he claims to know what it means yet. We don't even know string theory is right yet.
 
Hmm. This is all a bit too 'magical' for my taste. If you bear in mind that both error correcting codes and string theory are totally the product of human minds (no one has verified string theory) then it is not surprising that the two disciplines have some things in common. The fact that there is this parallel development between two such different fields of study could almost be taken as a reason to suspect that string theory is unlikely to be a correct model of our world. It seems very likely to be 'just made up' and its attractiveness is there because of its aesthetic appeal.
It could all be a very sophisticated form of Numerology'.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
22K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K