MHB A property of solution of ODE y''+p(x)y=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter ipaper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode Property
ipaper
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let $f$ be a solution of the following equation $y''+p(x)y=0$, $p$ is continuous on $\mathbb{R}$ such that $p(x)\leq 0$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$. Suppose that $f$ is defined on $[a,+\infty)$, $f(a)>0$, $f'(a)>0$, $a\in\mathbb{R}$ .

Prove $f(x)>0$ for all $x\in[a,\infty)$.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ipaper said:
Let $f$ be a solution of the following equation $y''+p(x)y=0$, $p$ is continuous on $\mathbb{R}$ such that $p(x)\leq 0$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$. Suppose that $f$ is defined on $[a,+\infty)$, $f(a)>0$, $f'(a)>0$, $a\in\mathbb{R}$ .

Prove $f(x)>0$ for all $x\in[a,\infty)$.

Any help would be appreciated.

Welcome on MHB ipaper!...

... writing the ODE as...

$\displaystyle y^{\ ''} = - p(x)\ y\ (1)$

... if $p(x) \le 0, \forall x \in \mathbb{R}$, $y(a)>0$ and $y^{\ '}(a)>0$, then y(x) must be a non decreasing function in $[a, + \infty)$ and therefore it will be $y(x)> 0\ \forall x \in [a, + \infty)$ ...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Would you please tell me more specifically? I haven't got the picture.
 
ipaper said:
Would you please tell me more specifically? I haven't got the picture.

All right!... writing again the ODE...

$\displaystyle y^{\ ''} = - p(x)\ y\ (1)$

... let's suppose $p(x) \le 0, y(a)>0, y^{\ '}(a)>0$... that means that for x=a y, y' are positive and y'' non negative... that means that for $x= a + \varepsilon$ it will be $y(a + \varepsilon) > y(a)$ and that is true for all $\varepsilon$, so that y will be a non decreasing function and that means that it will be $y(x) > 0$ for all x in $[a, + \infty)$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K