A question about Qubit (number of states)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter samaaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qubit States
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of qubits in quantum computing, specifically addressing the number of states that qubits can represent compared to classical bits. Participants explore the implications of superposition and entanglement in qubits, as well as the differences between classical and quantum systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that N qubits should be equivalent to N×2 classical bits, based on the idea that each qubit can represent two states simultaneously.
  • Another participant clarifies that a qubit can exist in a superposition of states, which leads to 2^N possible states for N qubits, emphasizing the role of entanglement.
  • A participant expresses confusion about whether a deeper understanding of quantum theory is necessary to grasp the concept of qubits.
  • One participant provides an example using electron spin to illustrate that three qubits can represent eight states simultaneously, questioning the binary nature of qubits.
  • Another participant confirms that while qubits exist in multiple states, measurement collapses them to binary outcomes, which is a key aspect of quantum computing.
  • A later reply explains that the addition of qubits increases the number of possible states exponentially, contrasting this with classical bits where each additional bit only adds two possibilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the equivalence of qubits to classical bits, with some supporting the 2^N states model while others maintain that qubits can be viewed as having two states. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of qubit states and their implications.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the probabilistic nature of qubits and the impact of measurement on their states, indicating a need for clarity on the definitions and assumptions related to qubit behavior.

samaaa
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hi

I read this information about the Qubit:
"N Qubits are equivalent 2^N classical bits (2^N states)"

But I couldn't understand that, because I know that each single Qubit could be one and zero at the same time, so each single Qubit is equivalent two classical bits (two states)
That mean:
If we have 3 Qubits it will be equivalent 6 classical bits(from 3×2)
If we have N Qubits it will be equivalent N×2 classical bits (not 2^N)

So can anyone tell me what is my misconception ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A qubit is not "zero or one", it can be both at the same time, with an unknown phase between the states. You cannot read out all those 2 bits, but you need two for a full description.

With more qubits, you can have entanglement between the bits - they can depend on each other, something you cannot get with 2*N bits.
You basically get 1 bit for each possible set of binary bit values in a measurement, and there are 2^n of them.
 
mfb said:
With more qubits, you can have entanglement between the bits - they can depend on each other, something you cannot get with 2*N bits.
You basically get 1 bit for each possible set of binary bit values in a measurement, and there are 2^n of them.

i don't understand :confused:
should i study quantum theory carefully to understand the qubit ? or i just need the basic concept of this theory ?
 
i will give example:
if we use the direction of Electron spin to represent the Qubit,spin up= 1 spin down=0
each electron could be spin up and down simultaneously (two states at the same time)

but if we have 3 Qubits, we will get a 8 states simultaneously ,
that mean each Qubit has a 8 states not two states
if the Qubit has a 8 states that mean Qubit is not binary:confused:
 
you answered your own question, 3 qubits have 8 states, 2^3=8

the qubits exist in 8 states simultaneously, but don't forget that when we measure them they will no longer exist as a superposition of states and will collapse to a set of their probabilistic values, which are binary because they can only be 0 or 1 as spin will be either up or down. Qubits are not manipulated in a binary matter but will always read out binary results, which is where the power of quantum computing lies.
 
Last edited:
thegarbageman said:
Qubits are not manipulated in a binary matter but will always read out binary results, which is where the power of quantum computing lies.

thank you for this information
now i understand how the Qubit works :smile:
 
also to answer your original question, yes a qubit in a sense is like 2 classical bits because it can be one of 2 values but a system of qubits interacts differently than a system of bits.

if you have 2 bits, 00 and you want to add a third bit of information to the end, you will either have 000 or 001

whereas if you have 2 qubits which could be 00, 10, 01, or 11 and you want to add another qubit to the end,
now you will either have 000, 001, 100, 101, 010, 011, 110, or 111.

the probabilistic nature of qubits means with each one you add to a system, you are doubling the possibilities of what the group of qubits can be read as which is why N qubits have the computing power of 2^N classical bits.
with classical bits, with each bit you add to the system you are only adding 2 possibilities
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
971
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K