A question about the significance of 3

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tanelorn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the significance of the number 3 in physics, particularly in relation to the three large dimensions, three generations of quarks, and three generations of leptons. Participants debated whether this number holds any intrinsic meaning or if it is merely coincidental, with some suggesting that the connection is esoteric and lacks substantial insights. The conversation also touched on the fundamental group of the Standard Model, represented as U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3), indicating that the number three may not be as significant as it appears. Ultimately, the thread concluded with a suggestion to focus on specific questions rather than broad numerological interpretations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Familiarity with quarks and leptons
  • Knowledge of quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Basic concepts of dimensionality in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Standard Model of particle physics and its fundamental groups
  • Explore the role of anomaly cancellation in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the significance of dimensionality in theoretical physics
  • Examine other numerical patterns in physics, such as the role of the number 2
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics and the implications of numerical patterns in scientific theories.

Tanelorn
Messages
906
Reaction score
15
Physics news on Phys.org
Tanelorn said:
A very quick question about the significance of 3:
So we have 3 large dimensions.
And we have 3 generations of quarks.
And we have 3 generations of Leptons.

Is there any known significance or reason or connection to the number 3?
Are there any other examples of sets of 3 in Physics?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model_(mathematical_formulation)#/media/File:Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg
A very quick answer about the significance of ##2##:
We have a quadratic electromagnetic force which is all around.
Newtons quadratic gravitation is a pretty good model for everyday experiences.
The normal distribution that is applicable almost everywhere in nature goes with ##e^{-t^2}##.
Our entire logic (true / false), ethics (good / bad), spirituality (ying / yang), most of biological processes (reproduction, cell division), computer arithmetic (0 / 1) and so on are all based on two.
Our functions which we use to describe the universe are subsets of a product space ##X \times Y##.
There is matter and antimatter, spin up and down, Pauli's exclusion principle - all ##2##.

Summary: You could do this for a lot of numbers: ##0\; , \;1\; , \;\pi\; , \;e ## or whatever. This doesn't carry any insights and IMO is pure esoteric. You mentioned the standard model, but it's fundamental group so far is ##U(1) \times SU(2) \times SU(3)##, so it's ##(1,2,3)## or ##(1,3,8)## depending on how you want to look at it. To pick the three from it is a bit randomly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu and Tanelorn
Don't forget the all important number 42 .
:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: XZ923, phinds and fresh_42
Arghhh here comes Numerology again.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
sophiecentaur said:
Arghhh here comes Numerology again.
Exactly. @Tanelorn, you're pissing up a rope on this one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and anorlunda
phinds said:
@Tanelorn, you're pissing up a rope on this one.
That mixes at least two separate metaphors!
 
marcusl said:
That mixes at least two separate metaphors!
I don't think so. It's an old military saying. Maybe if it had been 3 ropes :smile:
 
Tanelorn said:
And we have 3 generations of quarks.
And we have 3 generations of Leptons.
Whereas looking at another arbitrary number 3 is numerology, it is significant that these two numbers are the same (not 3 necessarily) for anomaly cancellation in QFT so I would even say that the OP is just a list of two numbers (not three) that happen to be the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanelorn
phinds said:
It's an old military saying.
That doesn't invalidate my observation...
 
  • #10
marcusl said:
That doesn't invalidate my observation...
I still disagree. Explain yourself, please.
 
  • #11
Ok :oldsmile:
Just because you heard it in the military doesn't mean that someone (in the military) didn't combine pissing into the wind with pushing on a rope.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
  • #12
marcusl said:
Ok :oldsmile:
Just because you heard it in the military doesn't mean that someone (in the military) didn't combine pissing into the wind with pushing on a rope.
Sounds like you are missing the point completely. This has nothing to do with pushing. Think what happens if you stand under a rope and piss up it.
 
  • #13
Ok, we've gotten off topic here. (We won't discuss your ability to stand and piss upwards onto a rope above you :o))
 
  • #14
Although it does seem like the most useful part of the thread
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42, Tom.G, Nugatory and 2 others
  • #15
Tanelorn said:
Are there any other examples of sets of 3 in Physics?

This is so broad that it falls into numerology. If you have a specific question about the relationship between a certain number and a specific concept in physics then feel free to ask, but please try to keep the focus narrow if you want to attract high quality answers.

It appears this thread is done.

Thread locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
801
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
2K