robheus
- 148
- 0
Watch this lecture (animated) online:
Last edited by a moderator:
Animated lecture on capitalism in crisis
- Context: News
- Thread starter robheus
- Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
Discussion
Physics news on Phys.org
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 5,706
- 1,592
And then what
Mentor
- 23,899
- 11,354
I got to the part where he parrot's Chomsky's factually incorrect refrain that incomes have stagnated or fallen since the 1970s and could go no further. Seems like the usual Marxist nonsense to me. Cool animation, though.
Unless you have a point to make/discuss, this thread will be locked.
Unless you have a point to make/discuss, this thread will be locked.
Last edited:
Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,114
- 3,277
This does not meet our minimum criteria for starting a thread.
Please be sure that you have read the guidelines beofere posting.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=113181
Please be sure that you have read the guidelines beofere posting.
In addition to content already prohibited by our global forum guidelines, the following are specifically NOT permitted in Politics & World Affairs:
1) Posts containing only a link or quotes from other sources without any explanation on the part of the person posting them, unless they are in direct response to a request from another member for a source to back up a claim.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=113181
Last edited by a moderator:
czelaya
- 43
- 5
Ok, as soon as I saw Marxist’s "point of view" I knew where this was going. The commentator got something very wrong.
He stated that the markets has been very symbolic of the Austrian theory (which is an incredible naive stand point- it hasn’t, because the Austrian methodology clearly doesn’t favor bail outs, and stresses that mismanaged private institutions and businesses should be allowed fail ), and then that many academics and economic policy makers should adhere to the Keynesian school (sorry to say that it has been Keynesian... we've been priming the pump... that's what all this deficit spending has been all about).
People don't seem to understand what corporatism is and how it ties to government intervention which leads directly to control. Corporatism is not capitalism.
He's right about the accumulation of capital, but he fails to see that it's the central planners that are also heavily benefiting by their economic policies.
He stated that the markets has been very symbolic of the Austrian theory (which is an incredible naive stand point- it hasn’t, because the Austrian methodology clearly doesn’t favor bail outs, and stresses that mismanaged private institutions and businesses should be allowed fail ), and then that many academics and economic policy makers should adhere to the Keynesian school (sorry to say that it has been Keynesian... we've been priming the pump... that's what all this deficit spending has been all about).
People don't seem to understand what corporatism is and how it ties to government intervention which leads directly to control. Corporatism is not capitalism.
He's right about the accumulation of capital, but he fails to see that it's the central planners that are also heavily benefiting by their economic policies.