raracon
- 35
- 14
- TL;DR
- Good sources not wiki
Title says it all :)
The discussion centers on finding reliable sources for understanding the Lamb shift beyond the Wikipedia article. Participants recommend Weinberg's "Quantum Theory of Fields, vol. 1, Sec. 14" for a modern treatment and express the need for sources that provide concise explanations without excessive detail. The consensus indicates that while various resources exist, none may fully meet the criteria of being shorter, requiring less background, and being more complete than the Wikipedia entry.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, researchers in quantum mechanics, and educators seeking concise and structured explanations of the Lamb shift will benefit from this discussion.
Yea, I've been lookkng through lots. But can't find reliable ones. I tought maybe one of you guys would know onephinds said:Seems likely
View attachment 290771
Actually, it doesn't.raracon said:Summary:: Good sources not wiki
Title says it all :)
Well I am searching for a source, where the Lamb shift is explained in a rather short manner (not going into too much detail).Vanadium 50 said:Actually, it doesn't.
What do you want that's not there? Otherwise it will turn into us guessing and you saying "no, that's not it".
Yeah, that is why I am searching for stuff not related to the Wikipedia article. :)berkeman said:@raracon don't like none of that. Especially the link to the Nobel lecture by Lamb...
View attachment 290803
OK, now we're getting somewhere. You want something that is:raracon said:Well I am searching for a source, where the Lamb shift is explained in a rather short manner (not going into too much detail).