raracon
- 35
- 14
- TL;DR
- Good sources not wiki
Title says it all :)
The discussion revolves around finding reliable sources on the Lamb shift, specifically alternatives to Wikipedia. Participants express their needs for concise explanations and structured definitions of the concept.
Participants do not reach a consensus on specific sources, and multiple competing views on what constitutes a suitable reference remain. The discussion is unresolved regarding the availability of sources that meet the specified criteria.
Participants have not clearly defined what they consider reliable or suitable sources, leading to ambiguity in the discussion.
Yea, I've been lookkng through lots. But can't find reliable ones. I tought maybe one of you guys would know onephinds said:Seems likely
View attachment 290771
Actually, it doesn't.raracon said:Summary:: Good sources not wiki
Title says it all :)
Well I am searching for a source, where the Lamb shift is explained in a rather short manner (not going into too much detail).Vanadium 50 said:Actually, it doesn't.
What do you want that's not there? Otherwise it will turn into us guessing and you saying "no, that's not it".
Yeah, that is why I am searching for stuff not related to the Wikipedia article. :)berkeman said:@raracon don't like none of that. Especially the link to the Nobel lecture by Lamb...
View attachment 290803
OK, now we're getting somewhere. You want something that is:raracon said:Well I am searching for a source, where the Lamb shift is explained in a rather short manner (not going into too much detail).