Are Current Experiments Impacting Quantum Coherence in Consciousness?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alrah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Consciousness
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential impact of current experiments on quantum coherence in consciousness, particularly in relation to the work of Professor Stuart Hammeroff on microtubules. Participants explore the implications of high-energy experiments on consciousness, the nature of consciousness in simple organisms, and the ethical considerations of studying consciousness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about ongoing experiments that might affect quantum coherence in consciousness, referencing Hammeroff's theory of consciousness as waveforms interacting in microtubules.
  • Another participant emphasizes the moral responsibility of consciousness researchers to avoid harming subjects while studying consciousness, suggesting that modifications should be safe and ethical.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that consciousness might be present in simple organisms like Paramecium, proposing that experiments with particle accelerators could be relevant.
  • Concerns are raised about how to operationally define and measure consciousness in organisms like Paramecium, noting the need for observable behavioral changes to indicate consciousness effects.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the relevance of the discussion to quantum mechanics and encourages adherence to forum rules regarding speculative content.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of views on the relationship between consciousness and quantum mechanics, with no consensus reached on the implications of experiments or the nature of consciousness itself. Ethical considerations and operational definitions of consciousness remain points of contention.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clear definitions of consciousness, the speculative nature of linking high-energy experiments to consciousness effects, and unresolved questions about the operationalization of consciousness in experimental settings.

alrah
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've been following the work of Professor Stuart Hammeroff et al. and his group's work on microtubules as best I can, and I simply wish to know: are there any experimental tests currently going on either on Earth or in Space that may potentially affect the quantum coherence of human (or other) consciousness?

[Added]Einstein once said that everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. It's always the very simple questions that are hardest to answer, so I'm going to briefly walk through my current understanding in the hope of offering you good people a rope (if not a string). ;-)

Professor Hammeroff talks about consciousness as two waveforms meeting in the microtubule that result in a microsecond of consciousness that he calls a 'bing', and the result of these rapid fire 'bing' events is to create the illusion that consciousness is continuous. From where do these waveforms arise? From the ZPE level and along the geometry of spacetime until it hit's the microtubule and goes 'bing' when it meets another waveform.

Now - if matter distorts spacetime, then consciousness must, to some degree, depend upon the distortion of spacetime. So if we do experiments that deconstruct matter at a fundamental level, then how much anti-distortion of spacetime would it take to interfere with the quantum waveforms that results in consciousness? Do we know this yet?

In Hiroshima (1945), after the nuclear bomb it's common to read reports of victims loosing consciousness at the same time as the flash, and this can't be adequately explained by the explosive aftermath. If this was a directly observable effect upon quantum consciousness, then might more localised high energy experiments also affect consciousness? In fact - if the experiment is more localised and affects the geometry of spacetime more directly than the unfocused effects of a nuclear explosion... (say: to look into anti-matter for instance) - then doesn't the likelihood of affecting consciousness increase by a marked order of magnitude? Akin to the effects of diffused light compared to a high powered laser (for instance)? If we get anywhere close to affecting ZPE through altering spacetime, might we unwittingly create something that has a more widespread effect upon our consciousness at more universal levels?

I'm just wondering how much is too much when it comes to the deconstruction of matter and it's affects upon spacetime and therefore - consciousness? How would we begin to measure such a thing?

Thank you.”
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think any consciousness researcher would need to contend with the usual moral issues of not harming their subjects. One would always try to study consciousness by modifying it in some way, and see how it responds. That would need to be done in a safe and responsible way, whether using lasers or drugs. Often, it is done by studying a situation that was not caused by the researchers, but can be taken advantage of by them.
 
Well - in the most primitive sense of the word, a single cell Paramecium possesses consciousness (via microtubules). That would probably be a good place to start with. I wonder if there's ever been any experiments along these lines with particle accelerators?
 
How could you tell if you affected the consciousness of a paramecium? You need some kind of operational definition of how consciousness behaves. That often requires being able to ask it.
 
Ken G said:
How could you tell if you affected the consciousness of a paramecium? You need some kind of operational definition of how consciousness behaves. That often requires being able to ask it.

A Paramecium is a simple single cell organism with a predictable and limited set of behaviours that only uses microtubules to operate consciously. It hunts, finds mates, has sex, and learns.

If the subject's behaviours were subject to a marked excitation, sluggishness or non-action (suggesting a loss of consciousness) then we would know that consciousness has been affected. Of course - you would have to engineer the experiment to shield the creatures from all other effects so that only the potential changes to spacetime from the high energy deconstruction of matter could affect the consciousness of the Paramecium.

[Subsequent experiments could (potentially) focus on the learning ability of Paramecium to adapt to changes in Spacetime - but this is going off topic a bit.]
 
I'm afraid this has nothing to do with Quantum Mechanics.

I'd also like to encourage people to reread the PF Rules on Overly Speculative Posts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
846
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K