I Are Expectation Values Measured for Coupled Photons from SPDC?

  • Thread starter Thread starter emuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupled Photons
Click For Summary
Entangled photons are produced through parametric down conversion (SPDC), with ordinary and extraordinary beams having distinct polarizations. The discussion raises a question about the relationship between photons that do not emerge from the intersection of the cone shells but are assigned to each shell. It is noted that if these photons are distinguishable, they cannot be considered entangled, as one will be vertically polarized and the other horizontally polarized. The conversation seeks information on whether expectation values have been measured for such distinguishable photons in Type II SPDC. Understanding these measurements could provide insights into the behavior of non-entangled photons in this context.
emuc
Messages
31
Reaction score
2
Entangled photons are generated, for example, by parametric down conversion (SPDC). The ordinary photon beam has polarization 0° and the extraordinary photon beam comes with the polarization 90°. Each photon leaves the source in a cone of light. Both cone shells intersect in two beams, which are thus each a mixture of horizontally and vertically polarized photons in equal share.

My question is how are photons related, which do not emerge on the line of intersection of the cone shells but are each clearly assigned to one of the two cone shells.

Does anybody know if this is measured already?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
emuc said:
My question is how are photons related, which do not emerge on the line of intersection of the cone shells but are each clearly assigned to one of the two cone shells.
If the photons are distinguishable - as they would be in this case - they will not be entangled. One will be V, the other H. This is for what is called Type II SPDC. Not being entangled, they act independently as to polarization.
 
Do you know about measurements of expectation values for this case?
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K