Are higher voltage batteries safe for electric vehicles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsTest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Battery Voltage
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the safety and implications of using higher voltage batteries in electric vehicles (EVs). Participants explore various voltage standards, safety regulations, and the design considerations necessary for operating at voltages above common thresholds, such as 60V.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the safety of using batteries above 60V, citing standards that classify voltages above this threshold as hazardous.
  • Others point out that modern EVs operate at significantly higher voltages (e.g., 450V for Tesla), suggesting that with proper design, these systems can be safe despite the risks.
  • A participant notes that safety standards are somewhat arbitrary and based on the likelihood of injury, indicating that the chosen voltage limits may not reflect a clear boundary of danger.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for injury even at lower voltages, with examples from different industries highlighting that voltages as low as 32V can be dangerous in certain conditions.
  • There is mention of the need for specialized training for workers dealing with voltages above 50V, as specified by OSHA, indicating that higher voltages require significant safety measures.
  • Some participants discuss the trade-offs between using higher voltages for efficiency and the associated costs, as well as the regulatory landscape in different regions, such as Australia.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of concerns and insights regarding the safety of higher voltage systems in EVs. There is no consensus on the safety implications, and multiple viewpoints regarding voltage standards and safety practices remain present.

Contextual Notes

Discussions reference various safety standards and regulations, but the applicability and interpretation of these standards may vary by context and region. The conversation includes assumptions about the design and safety measures in place for high-voltage systems.

PhysicsTest
Messages
260
Reaction score
27
TL;DR
General query on the operating voltages of the battery
I have few questions on the battery voltages for electric vehicles. Some vehicles operate at 48V battery and when i read the standards regarding these they mention above >60 V is hazardous and may lead to electrical shock and shall be avoided under all conditions. But i also see batteries with 72V used for electric vehicles, does this not raise any conflict as it is by default above 60V?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
PhysicsTest said:
Summary:: General query on the operating voltages of the battery

I have few questions on the battery voltages for electric vehicles. Some vehicles operate at 48V battery and when i read the standards regarding these they mention above >60 V is hazardous and may lead to electrical shock and shall be avoided under all conditions. But i also see batteries with 72V used for electric vehicles, does this not raise any conflict as it is by default above 60V?
Modern electric vehicles (Tesla, et.al.) use battery packs that operate at 100's of volts (Tesla's use about 450V). Your house is powered with 100's of volts (AC). Yes, these could kill you. However, if built and designed properly, the entire system can be safe. Perhaps like your lawn mower, which is also scary inside.

So, why >60V is dangerous? Well, safety standards have to have limits/rules. So, it's a bit arbitrary if you look closely, but still based on the likelihood of injury. They had to pick a number (numbers, actually). The most common limits for accessible voltage is 60Vdc or 30Vrms.
 
Where did you read that? Please give a link. Are you sure it did not refer to golf carts?

Here is some data posted recently.

1640293567428-png.png
 
The difference between an electrical contractor and a telephone linesman grew from the nominal 48 VDC battery used in telephone exchanges. When fully charged the voltage could peak at just less than 60 VDC.
Power distribution, employing higher voltages such as 110 VAC, with low impedance, were the domain of electrical contractors.

Each trade was trained, certified and standardised differently, so it was sensible to use the telephone system voltage as the upper bound to what became classed as “Low Voltage”.

There is no theoretical voltage at which things suddenly become dangerous. I expect that voltages as low as 32 V could be dangerous in some environments. High-current electric arc welding usually operates at about 24 V. It is not unusual for the operator to feel a “tingle” when surfaces are wet, but the current is not sufficient to cause an involuntary muscle contraction.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
PhysicsTest said:
But i also see batteries with 72V used for electric vehicles, does this not raise any conflict as it is by default above 60V?
The high voltage parts are well built/covered: the equipment the user can directly interact still works with only low voltage.

The 'no user serviceable parts inside' warning is dead serious.
 
OSHA has also specified that 50V is the safety limit for many industries (LINK) - above which presents enough of a hazard requiring the workers to be properly trained. So - for systems where it is commonly expected that unqualified the people working on the equipment will be exposed - they stick to 48V. ( Many trucks, fork or lift trucks, etc)

As is pointed out we have many cases using voltages higher than this - and in many cases the protections necessary to prevent unintended contact - especially by unqualified persons is significant.

In EVs this is a particularly difficult challenge, EV's are operated in hundreds of volts with a lot of discussion to have 1200-1500V systems in the 5 to 10 year range.
 
Windadct said:
In EVs this is a particularly difficult challenge, EV's are operated in hundreds of volts with a lot of discussion to have 1200-1500V systems in the 5 to 10 year range.
There is an energy and cost penalty to buying and driving around with a heap of copper in the vehicle. Insulation is cheaper and it weighs less. Higher voltages cost less to buy and less to run.

I believe that now in Australia, you can work on automotive systems up to a nominal 50 V without certification. You need a high voltage ticket to work on higher voltage electric cars.
That is wise, as most people would be surprised by HV DC.

The same goes for solar panel arrays. Anyone can wire them in parallel, but you need a high voltage ticket to wire them in series.

Last time I looked at the rules in Australia, a ham radio operator needed a special exemption certificate before they change a vacuum tube in an old wirless set or their linear amplifier, even if they built it themselves when they were younger and more foolish.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K