High School Average Value Uncertainty: How to Compute?

Click For Summary
To compute the average uncertainty associated with a set of measurements, simply averaging the uncertainties is not appropriate, as it can skew results by giving undue weight to less accurate measurements. Instead, there are established methods that provide a more precise estimate, particularly when dealing with large sets of values. The average of the values themselves may not represent the best estimate due to the influence of outliers. It is crucial to apply these rules to ensure accurate representation of the data. Understanding these principles is essential for effective data analysis in scientific measurements.
DoobleD
Messages
259
Reaction score
20
I have a set of values I got from measurements, and each of these value has an uncertainty associated to it.

I compute the average of my values. How can I average the uncertainty associated to my average value ? Do I simply take the average of all uncertainties ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. This way you do injustice to accurate measurements and you let bad measurements have too much weight.
There are simple rules for this. The average isn't the best estimate: that is the http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phys2150/phys2150_sp14/phys2150_lec4.pdf.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and DoobleD
BvU said:
No. This way you do injustice to accurate measurements and you let bad measurements have too much weight.
There are simple rules for this. The average isn't the best estimate: that is the http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phys2150/phys2150_sp14/phys2150_lec4.pdf.

Thank you ! I have just read somewhere that indeed this is more precise and used more often in practice when we have a large set of values for a measurement.
 
BvU said:
No. This way you do injustice to accurate measurements and you let bad measurements have too much weight.
There are simple rules for this. The average isn't the best estimate: that is the http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phys2150/phys2150_sp14/phys2150_lec4.pdf.
Loved the Dilbert comic in that link.
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
1K