Ballentine: QUANTUM MECHANICS A Modern Development

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the book "Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development" by Ballentine, focusing on its value and style of exposition. Participants explore whether the mathematical approach presented in the book is consistent throughout and seek additional comments on its overall quality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses appreciation for the book's mathematical exposition, noting it resembles a math lesson rather than a physics lesson, with explicit and complete mathematical principles.
  • The same participant inquires whether this style is maintained in the later chapters and invites further comments on the book.
  • Another participant provides a link to previous comments about the book, suggesting that there may be additional insights available.
  • A later reply indicates that the book seems worth the investment, although it reflects on the difficulty of searching for relevant threads on the topic.
  • Another participant shares a link to a reader's review on Amazon, implying that there may be more opinions available there.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the book's overall value, as opinions are still being gathered and explored. There are multiple viewpoints regarding its mathematical style and whether it is consistently applied throughout the text.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention challenges in searching for relevant discussions, which may limit the breadth of opinions available on the book.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in quantum mechanics, particularly those looking for resources that emphasize mathematical rigor in physics texts, may find this discussion relevant.

birulami
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
At Amazon the http://www.worldscibooks.com/physics/3142.html" does not have a reader's review yet. Anyone here want to comment whether it is worth its money. On their website I read the first few sections and I like the exposition of the mathematical principles. It is closer to the style of a math lesson than a physics lesson, meaning the math is mostly explicit and complete and not the physics style shortcut math found in many books.

Is this style continued in the later chapters? Other comments about the book?

Thanks,
Harald.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you, seems to be worth the money. (I tried a search for Ballentine, but got too many results. I should have remembered to always search for the title of the thread I want to initiate. It is interesting to see how good these match.)

Harald.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K