Ballentine - Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the book "Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development" by L. E. Ballentine, focusing on its merits compared to other quantum mechanics textbooks. Participants share their opinions and experiences with the book, discussing its content and approach to quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express strong approval of Ballentine's book, describing it as the best among various non-relativistic quantum mechanics textbooks they have encountered.
  • Others appreciate Ballentine's ability to avoid what they consider unnecessary complexities found in other texts.
  • A participant compares Ballentine favorably to another well-known textbook by Sakurai, indicating a preference for Ballentine's approach.
  • One participant mentions ordering the book after seeing recommendations from respected members of the forum and expresses satisfaction with the content upon initial review.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the quality of Ballentine's book, with multiple positive viewpoints expressed. However, there is no detailed discussion of specific content or areas of disagreement regarding the book's approach or theories.

Contextual Notes

No limitations or unresolved issues were explicitly mentioned in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in quantum mechanics, particularly those seeking recommendations for textbooks or looking for alternative perspectives on quantum mechanics literature.

Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
14,611
Reaction score
7,237
Yesterday, I have finished with reading of the book
L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development
I have seen many textbooks on non-relativistic QM, but for me this one is simply the best.
I highly recommend it to everybody.

I would also like to see the opinion of the others who have seen the book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree. It's an excellent book. Ballentine dispenses with much of the nonsense that slips into some books.
 
I have it, and I, too, think that it excellent. I like it much better than, for example, Sakurai.
 
Having seen in this thread the previous recommendations for Ballentine from several people
I respect very much on Physics Forums, I decided to order a copy. (I already have quite a
few other QM/QFT books.)

My copy arrived this morning, and I immediately dipped into several sections to see how
he deals with certain topics. I am so pleased in every instance that I'll now make
time to (eventually) read the entire book. :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
913
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K