Basic Convolution - if someone wouldn't mind checking

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrogPad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convolution Mind
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 4K views
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I have two convolution problems, that I would like to be sure are right. If someone wouldn't mind the fun job of checking these, that would be great.

QUESTION:

Compute the convolution of [itex]x(t)[/itex] and [itex]h(t)[/itex] where:

1:
[tex]x(t) = u(t)[/tex]
[tex]h(t) = e^{-at}u(t), \,\,\, a>0[/tex]

2.
[tex]x(t) = u(t) - u(t-T_1)[/tex]
[tex]h(t) = u(t) - u(t-T_2), \,\,\, T_1 > T_2[/tex]


"ANSWER":
Let [itex]y(t)[/itex] be the convolution of x(t), h(t)


(1):

[tex]t < 0[/tex]:
y(t) =0

[tex]t \geq 0[/tex]:
[tex]y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^t e^{-a(t-\tau)}d\tau = \frac{1}{a}[/tex]


(2):

[tex]t < 0[/tex] or [tex]t-T_2 > 0[/tex]:
y(t) =0

[tex]t \geq 0[/tex] and [tex]t-T_2 < 0[/tex]:
[tex]y(t) = \int_0^t d\tau = t[/tex]

[tex]t-T_2 > 0[/tex] and [tex]t<T_1[/tex]:
[tex]y(t) = \int_{t-T_2}^t d\tau = T_2[/tex]

If I need to show more steps, please let me know. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HallsofIvy said:
Is u(t) a specific function- say, the unit step function?

My apologies. I thought that was the standard notation. Yes, u(t) is the step function.

EDIT: I see how I should have said that to begin with. It is rather vague in the opening question.
 
I don't think your first integral is correct. For [itex]t \geq 0[/itex], [tex]\int_{0}^{t}x(t) h(t-\tau) \ d \tau = \int_{0}^{t} e^{-a(t-\tau)} \ d \tau[/tex].
 
Is what I posted considered too much help? I just wanted to show the OP the setup was wrong. I didn't think I solved the problem already. But I guess I can keep this in mind next time.
 
Corneo said:
Is what I posted considered too much help? I just wanted to show the OP the setup was wrong. I didn't think I solved the problem already. But I guess I can keep this in mind next time.

I think you were fine. I redid the first one and got this:

[tex]y(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(\tau)h(t-\tau)d\tau[/tex]

Setting up the bounds gives:
[tex]x(\tau)[/tex] --- a step function in the [itex]\tau[/itex] domain.
[tex]h(t-\tau)[/tex] --- (this is kind of hard to describe), but... a inverted decaying exponential that has a value from [itex]-\infty[/itex] to [itex]t[/itex] in the [itex]\tau[/itex] domain.

We now look at the overlap regions:

[tex]t<0[/tex] , [tex]y(t) = 0[/tex]

[tex]t \geq 0[/tex] , [tex]y(t) = \int_0^t e^{-a(t-\tau)}d\tau = \frac{1}{a}(1- e^{-at})[/tex]

Thus, [tex]y(t) = \frac{u(t)}{a} (1 - e^{-at})[/tex]

Does this look better?
 
For the second problem.

x(t) = u(t) - u(t - T1)
y(t) = u(t) - u(t-T2)
y(t)=x(t)*h(t)Graphically,

[tex]x(\tau)[/tex] is a function that is 1 from 0 to T1
[tex]h(t-\tau)[/tex] is a function that is 1 from t-T2 to t

Thus the bounds are:

[tex]t< 0[/tex]: no overlap, [tex]y(t) = 0[/tex]

[tex]t-T_2 > T_1[/tex]: no overlap, [tex]y(t) = 0[/tex]

[tex]t>0[/tex] AND [tex]t-T_2 < 0[/tex]: partial overlap (left side)
[tex]y(t) = \int_0^t d\tau = t[/tex]

[tex]t-T_2 > 0[/tex] AND [tex]t< T_1[/tex] h(t-tau) is fully enclosed within x(tau)
[tex]y(t) = \int_{t-T_2}^t d\tau = T_2[/tex]

[tex]t-T_2 < T_1[/tex] AND [tex]t> T_1[/tex]: partial overlap (right side)
[tex]y(t) = \int_{t-T_2}^{T_1} d\tau = T_1 + T_2 -t[/tex]

Is this right? Thanks again you guys
 
FrogPad said:
Does this look better?

This one looks right.